Has anyone created a successful automated trading system? What is your advice? - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This has been in mt5 for a long time now.
The mt4 tester sucks and doesn't even make sense to run it.
For some reason, most people make the same mistake on the tester and optimiser. Namely, the lack of emulation of regular outputs. It turns out that if a strategy at least worked in the first few months, it accumulates a balance that is very difficult to lose. But for some reason everyone counts profit on the initial deposit. Emulate monthly withdrawals up to the initial deposit volume, and the results may surprise you.
An alternative option is to use reinvestment.
Is there a withdrawal emulation in the mt5 tester?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/docs/common/testerwithdrawal
This has been in mt5 for a long time now.
The mt4 tester sucks and makes no sense to even run it.
Don't be so harsh, every tool is for its own work)
Don't be so harsh, every tool is for its own work)
I agree, the mt4 tester is for generating pretty pictures and nothing more.
Don't be so harsh, each tool is for its own work)
For example, for what?
For example, for what?
4ka is for simple miscalculations. 4ka tester simulates ticks and there is no tick history there. But it's good for quick checks. OHLS on history. It is enough for many tasks, without taking into account the market realities.
4ka is for simple miscalculations. 4ka tester simulates ticks and there is no tick history there. But it is good for quick checks. OHLS on history. It is enough for many tasks, without taking into account the market realities.
For quick checks 5 is no less suitable. The main advantage in 5's quotes is the absence of "holes", which very often affect the "four".
And reports in 5 are noticeably better than in 4.
For quick checks, the 5 is no less suitable. The main advantage of 5's quotes is that there are no "holes", which are very often the case with 4's.
And reports in 5 are noticeably better than in 4.
I am still hampered by the complexity of the proximity of concepts to the stock market environment. To work out the logic, you have to simplify. And this is exactly in 4. I.e. the task of determining the states of a series, beginnings, ends of stable states must not take into account the times varying spread, the broker's tricks, these are eternal and complex tasks of mathematics and other disciplines. The stock market environment gets in the way.