From theory to practice - page 714
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Let me look at the different types of SB, why is everyone so attached to them?
The data are derived from the HSS and the calculation of their sum at each iterative step.
1. "Coin". Uniform distribution of increments.
2. Wiener process. Gaussian distribution for increments.
3. Laplace motion. Laplace distribution for the increments.
Well, the market is certainly more like Laplace motion...
And if it is principally impossible to earn on it, as mathematicians on the forum say, then why bother? You have to give it up and just work as a janitor.
Amen.
Let me look at the different types of SB, why is everyone so attached to them?
The data are derived from the HSS and the calculation of their sum at each iterative step.
1. "Coin". Uniform distribution of increments.
2. Wiener process. Gaussian distribution for increments.
3. Laplace motion. Laplace distribution for the increments.
Well, the market is certainly more like Laplace motion...
And if it is principally impossible to earn on it, as mathematicians on the forum say, then why bother? You have to give it up and just work as a janitor.
Amen.
What's the difference between 1,2,3 and 1?
those "mathematicians"... they talk nonsense without understanding what's going on...
so? is there a big difference between these 1,2,3?
oh those, god forgive me, "mathematicians"... talking nonsense without understanding the essence...
If you understand the wrong path in time it will take less time to come back.
If you understand the wrong path in time, it will take less time to make a comeback.
You, for example, realise that these grief-mathematicians are talking about how you cannot make money on the 1-SB-process alone. But on the 2-SB process and on the 3-SB process you can make money? Do you get it? Do you see the obvious nonsense? Or don't you? Or are you only capable of uttering platitudes like "Yeah..." Pussycat Sparrow?
Let me look at the different types of SB, why is everyone so attached to them?
The data are derived from the HSS and the calculation of their sum at each iterative step.
1. "Coin". Uniform distribution of increments.
2. Wiener process. Gaussian distribution for increments.
3. Laplace motion. Laplace distribution for the increments.
Well, the market is certainly more like Laplace motion...
And if it is principally impossible to earn on it, as mathematicians on the forum say, then why bother? You have to give it up and just work as a janitor.
Amen.
You can take the 3rd chart as a base, and if you draw support and resistance lines, you can understand what additive, sorry, market makers add with their tactics. There is no chase for stops, which traders place below local lows or above local highs.
The 3rd chart can be taken as a basis, and if you draw support and resistance lines, you can understand what additive, sorry, market makers add with their tactics of action. There is no chase after stops, which traders place below local lows or above local highs.
Let me look at the different types of SB, why is everyone so attached to them?
The data are derived from the HSS and the calculation of their sum at each iterative step.
1. "Coin". Uniform distribution of increments.
2. Wiener process. Gaussian distribution for increments.
3. Laplace motion. Laplace distribution for the increments.
Well, the market is certainly more like Laplace motion...
And if it is principally impossible to earn on it, as mathematicians on the forum say, then why bother? You have to give it up and just work as a janitor.
Amen.
The spread and swap are not specified, if the rate is steep, then of course you cannot. The charts are wrong: all three of them show a global trend downwards, something is wrong with the generator.
so? is there a big difference between these 1,2,3?
oh those, god forbid, "mathematicians"... talking nonsense without understanding the essence...
Not only is there a complete lack of understanding, but there is no perception of cause and effect and no coherent logic of inference...