From theory to practice - page 306
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
nope, 100% of what?))
)))
OK, there's no pre-meeting conversation.
good luck!
And we are talking about collusion.)
On the market, it's bullshit. But with a DC, anything can happen.
)))
Okay, no pre-meeting conversation.
good luck!
https://medportal.su/mnitelnost-prichiny-priznaki-metody-borby/
Any DC, by its very definition, is a kitchen.) No matter how you choose, you will trade with a kitchen, and nothing else.)
You can not think like that, the stock market is also a gondola, in general the market is efficient and you can not speculate with a stable advantage over the market, the other is against the rules, one way or another, whether it is prescribed in the law (insider trading, etc.) or not, it all depends on the scale of your trade and the amount of dough taken from the market, you should not be visible, the more visible the more likely to get caught. It used to be hard to prove insider trading, now it's decided more on the POSSIBILITY and RELIABILITY than on available evidence, it's all about lawyers and compromising evidence, not facts, but unless you have connections in big politics, you definitely won't get billions to speculate with steady pluses, it's insider trading, you'll go to jail.
You cannot reason like that, the stock exchange is also a kitchen, in general the market is efficient and speculation is not possible with a stable advantage over the market, otherwise it is against the rules, one way or another, whether it is prescribed in the laws (insider trading, etc.) or not, it all depends on the scale of your trade and the amount of dough taken from the market, it is advisable to be invisible, the more noticeable the more likely to fall under the handout . In the past, insider trading was difficult to prove, now it depends more on the POSSIBILITY and RELIABILITY than on available evidence, it's all about lawyers and compromising evidence, not facts, but in general if you have no connections in big politics, they will not let you speculate billions with stable pluses, this is insider trading, they will put you in jail.
+++
Finally,
at least with someone,
there is an opportunity to talk on the same wavelength
That's what I've been doing lately, writing a system to keep you from cheating.
But what I need is for that system to be fought
the task becomes even more difficult on the one hand, and on the other, the market gives you all it's got, also out in the open!
It all depends on the scale of your trade and the amount of dough taken from the market, it is advisable to be low-profile, the more visible the more likely you are to get caught out.
The less likely - as liquidity providers will not get involved with big money to cheat because of legal and other risks...
And if the money is small, the chances of getting caught increase because of impunity...
That's exactly what I've been doing lately - writing a system to prevent cheating.
There's nothing to write - just compare the current prices with the strike price... There are also ready-made services... But it won't prevent cheating))
There's nothing to write - just compare the current prices with the performance price... There are also ready-made services... But it won't stop you from cheating))
Andrei, what makes you think the price is different?
The price is the same everywhere.
Apart from the price, what's left???
There's cheating.
Good luck!
Andrei, what makes you think the price is different?
The price is the same everywhere.
Apart from the price, what's left?
Renat, what's the cheating going to be? - Only by drawing a non-existent price. It seems obvious.
Renat, what is the cheating about? - Only by drawing a non-existent price. It seems obvious.
Well, now you need to create a TS, so that it does not plummet
)