From theory to practice - page 1971

[Aleksey Nikolayev]

Maxim Dmitrievsky:

And that's more of a deep commentary in the thread )

Come on) Usually one thinks of the "brown note" or the famous Freudian association of money with Mr.)

[Uladzimir Izerski]

Aleksey Nikolayev:

Come on) One usually thinks of the "brown note" or the famous Freudian association of money with Mr.)

If you can't get even a small fraction out of the market, you can call money whatever word you want. Hee hee.

It's especially sonorous sounding from such sounding peeps. Hee-hee. Graze the sheep. You'll make more money.

[Alexander_K]

Uladzimir Izerski:

Vova, it would be interesting to hear how you feel about Scrigan's theory

https://smart-lab.ru/blog/468221.php
https://smart-lab.ru/blog/420938.php
https://smart-lab.ru/blog/412671.php etc.

Regards,

Toddler

[Uladzimir Izerski]

Alexander_K:

Vova, it would be interesting to hear how you feel about Scrigan's theory

https://smart-lab.ru/blog/468221.php
https://smart-lab.ru/blog/420938.php
https://smart-lab.ru/blog/412671.php etc.

Regards,

Toddler

I will read it now. Already interesting.

[Uladzimir Izerski]

Alexander_K:

Vova, it would be interesting to hear how you feel about Scrigan's theory

https://smart-lab.ru/blog/468221.php
https://smart-lab.ru/blog/420938.php
https://smart-lab.ru/blog/412671.php etc.

Regards,

Toddler

Thanks for the links. Interesting people's reasoning.

But the fact is on the face or ... on the snout is the same.

The market should not be understood mathematically but realistically. The market is not presented to make money as some people understand it. But it does not exclude this possibility.

P.s.

This December the market is at a complete standstill. This is due to the pandemic, a halt in economic activity. Mathematics will be powerless to predict events in the near future. But with a realistic view it is even easier to estimate.

[Renat Akhtyamov]

There is no diffusion in forex. There are only two formulas that work. Both shown. I don't know why this is the case, but it's like a money printing press. Even before the first run of the program an error came up "stop all financial transactions pending clarification". I don't know. I am watching the program and do not believe my eyes and the most interesting thing is that it is difficult to understand it myself. Fuck, I wrote it myself ;). In short, the output at a resonance like the most correct price. Such a price is difficult to find and find out, but it is possible. The profit is small, in the range of 2 5 points, past the noise, as it were, exactly in the price. Mql works fast, so during a tick there are about 100 thousand variants of predicted financial results of a planned trade operation, the best one is chosen and an entrance is made. And it has been noticed - if you open inside spread, you may as well stop winning. I don't understand why yet.

[Uladzimir Izerski]

Renat Akhtyamov:
There is no diffusion in forex. There are only two formulas that work. Both shown. I don't know why this is the case, but it's a straightforward money printing press. Even before the first run of the program an error came up "stop all financial transactions pending clarification". I don't know. I'm watching it and can't believe my eyes and the most interesting thing is that it's hard to understand myself. Fuck, I'm squeaking by myself ;) In short, the input on the resonance is sort of the right price.

Resonance is wave number 9 up or 1 down. That's for sure. Who would believe it? Without checking.)

[Renat Akhtyamov]

Uladzimir Izerski:

Resonance is wave number 9 up or 1 down. That's for sure. Who would believe it? Without checking.)

You're in a hurry. I tweaked the post. There's no "or." It's accurate.

[Vitaly Muzichenko]

Uladzimir Izerski:

It doesn't matter now. Never mind.

Well, to the delight of well-wishers. I'll cheer you up, so to speak. Hee hee hee.

It's been a week with a loss. Don't shed any tears of joy.

I know how much attention I'm getting.

No one's got any attention, it just kind of springs to mind.

One has waves and curves, another has formulas, the third has a wonderful MACD, and the fourth has not a single losing trade of 20 pieces in 4 years.

And ALL of these non-working things are preached in almost every thread!

Bottom line: Market*0 = 0;

Where: "0" is all your systems combined.

And there are no tears, joy or fun.

There is a simple statement of fact.

[Renat Akhtyamov]

Vitaly Muzichenko:

No one was paying any attention, somehow it just happened by itself.

One has waves and curves, another has formulas, the third has a wonderful MACD, and the fourth has not a single losing trade of 20 pieces in 4 years.

And ALL of these non-working things are preached in almost every thread!

Bottom line: Market*0 = 0;

Where "0" is all your systems combined.

And there are no tears, joy or fun.

There is a simple statement of fact.

I did not say for nothing that there are 100,000 variations. It turns out that if you enter on a good signal anywhere, you can get into trouble. That's a bit far-fetched, about no loss at 20k. We've seen it.