From theory to practice - page 1835
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
For the "correlation matrix" - you have to do a topologistical-order (if I am not mistaken in the English transcription), and obviously based on fundamental data such as turnover and balances.
They change slowly, but clearly affect the limits of rate fluctuations. Without such a thing, the whole matrix is just a picture
You may try to look for cointegration between exchange rates and trade balances. For example, take the EURUSD exchange rate and the balance sheets of the USA and the Eurozone. You may use the API of the local calendar to calculate the balances. We will have to calculate them in R. We have to find a way to reduce balance sheets and exchange rates to a "common denominator" - it won't work in a "raw" form.
I do not see a special practical sense in this, but for an article (about the calendar and cointegration) may be suitable.
You could try to look for a cointegration of exchange rates and trade balances. For example, take the EURUSD exchange rate and the US and Eurozone balances. The balances can be taken from the API of the local calendar. We will have to calculate them in R. We have to find a way to reduce balance sheets and exchange rates to a "common denominator" - it won't work in a "raw" form.
I do not see a special practical sense in this, but for the article (about the calendar and cointegration) may be suitable.
They are not and cannot be cointegrated - most of the Forex market turnover is speculative and does not serve real foreign trade operations.
And not to "reduce to a common denominator", but to standardise.
Shame on you
You could try to look for a cointegration of exchange rates and trade balances. For example, take the EURUSD exchange rate and the US and Eurozone balances. The balances can be taken from the API of the local calendar. We will have to calculate them in R. We have to find a way to reduce balance sheets and exchange rates to a "common denominator" - it won't work in a "raw" form.
I don't see a special practical sense in it, but it may work for an article (about calendar and cointegration).
What does R have to do with it... it has nothing to do with anything.
you have to tie the technical analysis (which is 99% ready to work on the average hospital temperature) to the foundation.
As a sensible thought - rates move as-yet-unknown, but their amplitudes have limits - trade balances and their balances. Because, after all, it is not stocks, but currencies from which everything else is measured
Some song excerpts
Thank you, friend!
Shame on you
Your signature is correct.
What has R got to do with it... it has nothing to do with it at all.
You have to link technical analysis (which is 99% ready to work on average hospital temperature as well) to the fundamentals.
As a reasonable thought - rates move as-yet-unknown-how, but their amplitudes have limits - trade balances and their balances. Because it is not stocks, but currencies from which everything else is measured.
I don't see any contradiction between R and technical analysis. R is needed so as not to get bogged down at the stage of reinventing bicycles.
You can try to take the amplitude, the volatility, the trend or something else - the main thing is that the series obtained from the quotes were "proportionate" to the balance series (which are known at a limited number of points in time and change more slowly). This is what I call a common denominator.
I am always surprised by critics of martingale when they take the most primitive option without loss limits as an example and prove that martingale is bad.
I am always surprised by critics of martingale when they take the most primitive option without loss limits as an example and prove that martingale is bad. But there are a lot of variants of TS that use lot increase. Those who have been practicing it for a long time know that there are at least dozens of them. The critics of martingale must first study all these possible variants and work with their testing and then draw conclusions.
I don't see any contradiction between R and theanalysis. R is needed to avoid getting bogged down at the stage of reinventing bicycles.
You can try to take amplitude as well as volatility, trend or anything else - the main thing is that the series obtained from quotes are "commensurate" with the balance series (which are known at a limited number of points in time and change more slowly). This is what I call a common denominator.
There are a couple of moments left to dissect another naïveté.
There are a couple of moments left before another naive girl is dismembered.