From theory to practice - page 1008
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
indicators or what?
------
Chegevar is right, the best tool is logic and mathematics!
Who would argue, maths was once my favourite subject.
Who's to say, maths used to be my favourite subject.
here, I've tested it.
1.5 hours of EA and...
Equi pulled out
that's a different story.
If you don't want to have a drawdown, just don't.
;)
and then comes the fun part - geometry by equi, i.e. equi/balance -> infinity ;)Here, I've tested it.
1.5 hours of EA and...
Equi pulled out.
that's a different story.
If you don't want to have a drawdown, just don't let it happen.
;)
I have a different approach - you want to have ALL the profits available, take them!
forex with all its guts
it's a bit over the top...
forex with all its guts
it's a little over the top...
No, just an actual existing potential profit. It's not an overshoot, but a multi-year "observation" of the movements of the major currency pairs.
aah
i.e. the profit that is available within the risk, and the risk you have is no more than what % of the depo?
aaa
I.e. the profit that will be obtained within the risk, and the risk is not more than % of the deposit?
If there is a normal (unadulterated) trend movement, the risk can probably be neglected.
Reversals and flips of corresponding volumes should be taken into account and worked out, of course.
Yeah...
now!
https://www.oanda.com/lang/ru/forex-trading/analysis/open-position-ratios
They do not fight. In the market, as much is bought and as much is sold. There is always a complete balance.
You forget about the constant inflow of money into the market, which both bulls and bears are fighting for. If money did not flow in then the bulls would have a balance of 100 and the bears 0 or vice versa)))
ready ;)
Here, the risk 10`000%, you can more, the test 3 weeks, the lot is constant, I did not test further, because you take 4 parts, one drain and do not worry, or again take it, and so on:
I didn't lie, everything I wrote in this thread is true.
read, study and everything will work out
Anything specific on this case can only be said after obtaining and analyzing the start and end dates of the test,
the list of working pairs, results table, size of working lot and initial deposit.
But whether anyone else is interested is a big question.
It is possible to say something specific about this case only after obtaining and analysing the start and end dates of the test,
the list of working pairs, the table of results, the size of the working lot and the initial deposit.
But whether it interests anybody else is a big question.
it's all bullshit
do not pay attention
Killed four years for this system, roughly.
;)