Who trades on levels share their experiences - page 15

 
Sergey Lazarenko:

Identifying levels from A. Gerchik's point of view

https://fb.watch/2v7OnjWjDV/

https://fb.watch/2v7Ser8uZm/

Hercicomaniacs meet in another forum, that's where you are
 
Sergey Lazarenko:

Identifying levels from A. Gerchik's point of view

https://fb.watch/2v7OnjWjDV/

https://fb.watch/2v7Ser8uZm/

Those who have a BRAIN, understand that rock painting in the form of horizontal lines is the delirium of an addict: "what I see is what I sing"...

There are some coincidences with reality, but how can it be without it... - because sometimes, though very rarely, someone wins the jackpot in the lottery...

 
Vladimir Baskakov:
Hercicomaniacs meet in another forum, that's where you go.

Piss off, I'm not a Hercicomaniac

 

Metals, as of Monday morning


 

Euro, English pound


 

Swiss franc, Japanese yen


 

The Canadian Dollar, the only one (paired with Cable) to break above the Downtrend boundary, gave Klose higher...


 

Audi and Kiwi


 
Sergey Lazarenko:

Audi and Kiwi


Do you manage to trade profitably on levels? How much % do you have per month?

 

The hedge fund strategy is precisely working on levels. Banks work on the same principle. Each fund and bank has its own grid on a particular instrument. Where they stupidly sell, they stupidly buy. And the profit is obtained due to differentiation of instruments, and that's all.

If you have one account, you will be in the red. Even one and the same instrument has to be traded using different strategies. At least 3-4 for one instrument. There is one more trick, but I won't tell it. I can hint that there are legal entities and there are individuals. And there are statistics of where legal entities stand and where individuals stand. This is the direction. But banks trade in either direction on automatic. When the bank goes into a drawdown, the state refills the funds at our expense.