Registration for the Real Accounts (Cents) Championship July 2017 . - page 98
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thank you!
you can open an account on monday - normally it takes 5 to 6 days to verify
Please sign up !Sign Up Till 23:59:59 on 9.07.2017- to be exact !
https://view.new10.top/en/contest/3 July
I've just looked at these formulas and don't understand anything. Maybe discussed here, but I'm not going to read 98 pages
Please tell me whatminBalance,minDrawdown,minRec.Factor mean?
And if the difference is 0, then it will be a division by 0.
And also I am used to trading without losses and one month period is not a problem for this. Then the recovery factor (RV) will always be 0.
Can you imagine how much will become FS if I close only one order with -0.01? And why is the Sharp coefficient not taken into account when it shows the trading stability?
And this expression should be understood as follows
- Balance=(Balance - minBalance) / (maxBalance - minBalance) * 1.5
P.S. Of course it's all clear, but you can't write it that way.Greetings
Add me too.
Looking forward to a new account with no more than 1:200 leverage
I've just looked at these formulas and don't understand anything. Maybe discussed here, but I'm not going to read 98 pages
Please tell me whatminBalance,minDrawdown,minRec.Factor mean?
And if the difference is 0, then it will be a division by 0.
And also I am used to trading without losses and one month is not a problem for this. Then the recovery factor (RV) will always be 0.
Can you imagine how much will become FS if I close only one order with -0.01? And why is the Sharp coefficient not taken into account when it shows the trading stability?
And this expression should be understood as follows
- Balance=(Balance - minBalance) / (maxBalance - minBalance) * 1.5
P.S. Of course it's all understandable, but you can't write it that way.For those of you who have not forgotten mathematics, this notation of formulas should be really annoying.
To my similar requests for clarification of the formulas a more detailed (and slightly more sane) version of the formulas was given in post #851. And there was sort of a Sharpe factor first, but it was then replaced with a recovery factor. The recovery factor, as it turns out, just parses from the signals - hence the zeros popping out.
To my suggestion to make small changes that will take into account the peculiarities of values of non-normalized Recovery Factor (which should be compared only on a logarithmic scale) and remove the existing contradictions - no enthusiasm is shown.
This is not good :(
There was no enthusiasm for my suggestion to make small changes which would take into account the peculiarities of the non-normalised Recovery Factor values (which should only be compared on a logarithmic scale) and remove the contradictions that existed - no enthusiasm was shown.
There seemed to be a reaction, but there was no rebuttal to it
There seemed to be a reaction, but there was no rebuttal to it
What is there to refute? I'm talking about Thomas and the man is talking about Yeroma.
Here is my post explaining the problem with the formula and stating that I can offer a solution.
No one offered a solution.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/192255/page87#comment_5410431
None of this is surprising.
If such a signal is ranked in the top 10, then it turns out that this resource does not know how to rank a signal.
None of this is surprising.
If such a signal is ranked in the top 10, it turns out that this resource does not know how to determine the signal rating.
By the same principle, one participant here also tried to break into the "rocket" with the signal that already had successful trades on Friday's news before the signal was registered in the competition.
It's good that organisers made a wise decision to disqualify him.
And the signal of the comrade you cited is his principle of getting into the TOP. Of course, this is not a correct calculation, since the signal's profitability should be calculated from the moment of registration, not while the trader was "in the bush".
http://prntscr.com/fthv6w
What is there to refute? I'm talking about Thomas and the man is talking about Yeroma.
Here is my post explaining the problem with the formula and stating that I can offer a solution.
No one offered a solution.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/192255/page87#comment_5410431
That is, I can assume that if FS is "0", then it must be substituted by the minimum number, for example 0.000001
Is this correct, or do I need to recalculate something?
That is, I can assume that if the FS is "0", it should be replaced by a minimum number, for example 0.000001
Is this correct, or do I need to recalculate something?
The recovery factor is the ratio of the value of the current profit percentage
to the percentage of maximal relative drawdown.
I suggest you calculate it yourself, the data is already in the table, then the value is more accurate than in the signals tab. Here is the formula
Restitution Factor = Percent Profit / MaxRelativeDrawdown,
where
Percent Profit - profit percentage;
MaxRelativeDrawdown - percentage of maximum relative drawdown.