Registration for the Real Accounts (Cents) Championship July 2017 . - page 81
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yeah, shit, don't you get it that I'm talking about the formula as a whole -- whether it's sharpe or fwt -- either way the formula counts nonsense.
Suggest a solution, but not "around the bush", but in a concrete way.
Suggest a solution, but not "around the bush", but in a concrete way
Refresh your memory of that discussion, and the questions to be answered.
And I'm not talking "around the bush", but quite clearly and concretely pointing out the absurdity of these formulas.
Suggest a solution, but not "around the bush", but in concrete terms
Score =Gain/Drawdown
Refresh your memory of that discussion, and the questions that need to be answered.
And I'm not talking "around the bush", but quite clearly and concretely pointing out the nonsensicality of these formulas.
There was discussion, proof of something wrong, but no specifics.
Here there was specificity in the form of formulas, that's what was used in the calculations.
Sharpe has now been removed.
There was discussion, proof of something wrong, but no specifics
Here was the specifics in the form of formulas, that's what was used in the calculations.
Now Sharpe has been removed.
But now, having specific results of calculations using these formulas on actual data, now do you see that these formulas give out obvious nonsense?
Or do you want"it doesn't matter what it is"?
Why are you so obsessed with these formulas?But now, having concrete results of calculations by these formulas on actual data, now do you see that these formulas give out obvious nonsense?
Or do you want"it doesn't matter what it is"?
Suppose that is indeed the case, even without seeing the end result.
What's the solution to the situation?
Let's assume that this is indeed the case, even without seeing the end result.
What is the way out of the situation?
What is there to assume... The results of the formula calculations can be seen on the current data.
And what do you dislike about this quite reasonable "way out"Score =Gain/Drawdown
What's there to assume... You can see the results of the formula calculations on the current data.
And what don't you like this quite reasonable "way out of the situation"Score =Gain/Drawdown
OK, I'll look at that option.
OK, I'll look at that option.
Don't look. And don't listen to anyone.
You'll never please everyone. Don't even try, it's not so much futile as from any point of view pointless.
Fish love where the fish is deeper, but a man always drags the blanket over himself, even if the blanket is ***.
Ask each of the contestants what they think the formula should be for the second nomination and you will get answers in numbers equal to the number of contestants. And you don't need to guess why those formulas were suggested by each particular contestant.
Participants must accept the formula as it is, or not to accept and not to participate, assuming the opposite will inevitably lead to endless halivar.
Please add
https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/320530