Registration for the MetaQuotes-Demo Championships in May - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
no, that's no good)))
The organiser should choose the winner alone. or it's time to decide on the list of jury members.
And monitoring will not help?
Why doesn't monitoring help?
it will show everything perfectly.
need to look for 10 positions - well, in the monitoring it is also visible - how many positions have been taken?
Maybe you could use your eyes to see 80 percent or a script - we're almost all programmers and traders here :-) if anything
of course not. there will always be controversial points, and the organiser must have the right to make the final decision and the right to disqualify participants without explanation.
Platon is my friend - but the truth comes first.
In general, it is not a problem - they must be avoided - at most
Plato is my friend - but the truth is dearer.
all in all it's not a problem
But the organiser has not yet officially stated his right to be verified, which means he will not be able to do so after the end of the April event.
So we have practically no rules for April.
The only rule is that you have to be verified!
We have one participant who is not verified - he might be excluded, but he might be able to verify it before 28.04.17
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/187993/page71#comment_4810413only 3-4 points need to be checked, a script can be made, someone has to check the results of all participants before announcing the winners. this is extra work, and who said that life is easy for the judges?
That's what I wrote about when I suggested giving the judge investment passwords
It's not a problem to make up a script
1. We write a script that launches MT5 with a set configuration file for each of the participants. The file is generated on the basis of participants data from the database.
2. In MT5 there is an Expert Advisor that collects statistics, writes to the file if there are violations and closes the terminal.
3. it is done, say, once an hour.
4. admin looks through the violation file and takes out the minus meter
Demo - bad. Loss of time without a prize - it will scare away some participants.
Real account - advertising to the participant - seems to be forbidden on the resource. Make a subscription for the duration of the contest $ 1000, but then the amount can be changed, it turns out all the same advertising to the signal.
Display in the signals of the robot opened the deal or man - not the solution, you can open the deals through the program panel
To sum up, I can state the rules, which I like:
Demo account, buy-in of $5-10 (more than that would limit the number of participants), equity results with a limit of maximum drawdown of 10% (this shows the ability to work within the limits, to follow the MM and not to overlap the losses).
Prizes from sponsors are welcome.
The competitors will see anyway - at the end of the competition of course
MQ championships have also caught offenders - and not always instantly
The winner is declared defeated - as in an election :-) But if there is no destructive code in the voting machine, ;-)
But we will do without accusations of hacking, when someone entered the account and closed a profitable position without bringing it to the right value, or opened a losing trade - the wrong one :-)
What are you smoking? It's impossible to make transactions with the password.)
What are the rivals going to judge each other?
What are you smoking? It's impossible to make transactions with an investment password ))
;-) so I'm not talking about investing - I'm talking about hacking
The question brings to mind an obscene joke! - I cannot tell it - in public.