Sparring on MetaQuotes-Demo demo accounts - page 91

 
Alexander Laur:

That's my point: from the 1st to the 7th. And if the formula is finalised, you can be sent to the latter!
Right :-) it depends on how you sort it
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:
Right :-) It depends on how you sort it.
Nah, Alexander is exaggerating... It's hard to come up with criteria to make your lot last).
 
Andrey Dik:
No, Alexander is exaggerating... It's hard to think of criteria to make your horse last.)

It's hard to think of criteria to make your horse last.

p.s.

Look, someone from Iran.

 
Alexander Laur:

Gentlemen, one thing I don't understand is why not allow:

1. for traders to trade as they see fit;

Investors choose the trading style that is best for them personally.

What is the purpose of all these formulas to determine the winner? Why decide for someone else what is right and what is wrong. You all know? You are the final authority? It's not clear.

The Championship is at the very beginning, but some backstabbing is going on. Why would you kill a good initiative without giving it a chance to get stronger? Why?

Okay. No rules. Then how do we determine the winner? Everyone trades what they can, so who's the best? Who will have a better balance at the finish line? Another will ask why the balance and not the recovery factor? They may trade as they wish, but the one who makes the most trades wins! They have to be ready to trade as they wish, so they cannot do it as they wish.
 
Alexander Laur:

Gentlemen, one thing I don't understand is why not allow:

1. for traders to trade as they see fit;

Investors choose the trading style that is best for them personally.

What is the purpose of all these formulas to determine the winner? Why decide for someone else what is right and what is wrong. You all know? You are the final authority? It's not clear.

The Championship is at the very beginning, but some backstabbing is going on. Why would you kill a good initiative without giving it a chance to get stronger? Why?

Sasha, we've already agreed on two categories, which, by the way, will be even more interesting!

One is just for equity, the other for a nice flat line - without any special risks - the ones that investors really like. All we need is a sensible formula.

 
Alexander Laur:

They come to trading with one goal in mind - to make money. Thus, the criterion of determining the winner should correspond to the main goal - to profit. All other criteria are of the evil spirit. I do not want to argue. I have expressed my position.

Usually big investors are all old, people who have lived their lives do not like risks, they like stability.

They take Validol even when equity is above balance and continues to fly into space.

 
Alexander Laur:

People come to trading with one goal in mind: to make money. Therefore, the criterion for determining the winner must meet the main goal - the profit made. All other criteria are bogus. I do not want to argue. I have expressed my position.
I just want to understand. When you go to the bakery, do you choose the bread that is larger, or how do you choose in general?
 
Alexander Laur:

People come to trading with one goal in mind: to make money. Therefore, the criterion for determining the winner must meet the main goal - the profit made. All other criteria are bogus. I do not want to argue. I have expressed my position.
There is no formula. Equity 5836. That's what it says.
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:



twirl, beautiful

 
Alexander Laur:

I choose bread according to taste, the one I like. Size doesn't matter. But winning the Championship is not about buying bread from a bakery.


What kind of bread is best for you? Describe it in more detail.
Making money in trading is not the main thing, the main thing is how much it costs. Why not go and steal money? Or is it the consequences and the process of making money that is important?
So what is the best bread for you, everything says that you can easily get a brick in the guise of bread.