How can I tell the difference between a FOREX chart and a PRNG? - page 12
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yeah....
Listen up:
What you write in your post is an attempt to interpret fractal geometry passing it off as the fruit of your own thoughts. THANK YOU, BUT DON'T.
Well, don't, so don't.
Bye-bye.
Why invent conspiracy theories and prove there is no obvious presence effect etc. when the whole world uses the supply and demand theory for all markets? Well, I've written about this before.
I was taught in probability theory that uncorrelated series are virtually non-existent in nature. To pick two series with correlation coefficient = 0 is a "must do".
Well, don't, so don't.
Bye.
And here's how: on page 8 of this thread
https://forum.mql4.com/ru/53661/page8
ALSU gave definitions, but "forgot" to specify what role autocorrelation of series and correlation between consecutive random variables play there (these are somewhat different things, but that's not what we are talking about now).
So to start with - one should consider that correlation between supposedly random price quotes HAS to be present, and then proceed from that.
Why is it there - in the pricing themes.
Why it should be taken into account - well-ooooo, mate, in probability theory VERY ALL conclusions start with ".... random uncorrelated-values.....".
Does your understanding of pricing suggest that there is autocorrelation between price increments? Exactly correlation, not memory effects in general (non-marking)?
Are these assumptions enough for you and you don't need anything else from pricing? I.e. like in the TA premise - "the price remembers everything" and go on with the mathematics-statistics-cryptography))?
does your understanding of pricing suggest that there is autocorrelation between price increments? Exactly correlation, not memory effects in general (non-marking)?
Are these assumptions enough for you and you don't need anything else from pricing? I.e. like in the TA premise - "the price remembers everything" and go on applying mathematics-statistics-cryptography)?
I sense a certain unfriendliness in your questions. I usually stop the discussion immediately. But for you I will make an exception and answer:
1. The correlation between two bars of the M15 timeframe is the autocorrelation of a series which is between fifteen bars of M1. The correlation of the bars of the larger timeframe is the autocorrelation of the bars of the smaller timeframe, its microstructure. Add here the fact that the quotes received by you are already filtered, i.e. they already have the Slutsky Effect. Perhaps, that's why Privalov wanted unfiltered tick quotes so vehemently, and got banned for it (I'm more relaxed about the tick problem).
2. I don't know what "non-marking" is. Tautologies of flawed flawed speculative scholastic mathematical theories have never interested me.
3. not enough. Something else is needed.
4. TA. I can repeat again (see above) what is written in almost any probabilistic inference, and why POSTLY there are no methods for handling highly correlated "random" series in theor-ver (it's just exactly a belief, like in a cult). Professor Orlov (a well-known practitioner of probability theory, author of many articles, journal editor, and author of books) also writes about this, clearly warning about the dangers of applying statistics to economics.
There is such a notion asa Wiener process and there is a filter that monitors this process. It is called a Wiener Filter
The technology is simple. Feed the process to be analysed to the filter input, and watch the output. If the filter jingles (jargon) then the analyzed process is not Wiener's, but different from it...then it's the turn of statistical radio engineering..... There are a lot of letters, who is interested, I hope he will follow the links and at least read them.
Z.Y. We used to solve such problems with cadets at practical classes in radiolocation. The standard problem is to distinguish a noise at the radar input from a mixture of noise + signal...
Sergey, between tasks of random/unknown signal detection in radars and in quotes, with all letters being almost identical, there is an essential difference: for radars the calculation delay of an order of a pulse length itself is absolutely uncritical (not to mention that Wiener Filter ideally needs infinite observation time and strict stationarity of the system), but for trading it is almost a disaster. Therefore, the second problem is an order of magnitude more difficult, and not every radio engineering cadet will be able to cope with it.
AlexEro:
... "forgot" to specify what role autocorrelation of series and correlation between consecutive random variables plays there...
I didn't "forget", I just got tired of typing))
I didn't "forget", I just got tired of typing))
4. TA. I can repeat again (see above) what is written in almost any probabilistic output, and why POSTLY there are no methods for handling strongly correlated "random" series in theor-ver (it is just exactly a cult-like belief). Professor Orlov (a well-known practitioner of probability theory, author of many articles, journal editor, and author of books) also writes about this, clearly warning about the dangers of applying statistics to economics.