Searching for market patterns - page 128

 
avtomat:

Those who don't believe in the manipulation of brokers are like ostriches hiding from reality by burying their own heads in the sand. ;)))

We should only be interested in the fact of price movement, why do we need to know who moves it and how, if we cannot influence this process?
 

Don't scalp or do anything "hard" and then the thought of a broker watching you and interfering in your trading will be unnecessary.

Such thoughts out loud...

 

No, you need to be scalping or doing something "hard" and then the thought of a broker watching you and interfering with your trading will be unnecessary.

Such thoughts out loud...

 
yosuf:
We should only be interested in the fact of price movement, why do we need to know who moves it and how, if we cannot influence this process?


We cannot influence it. But understanding the process, its causes and possible consequences is a useful and necessary condition for successful navigation in this sea.

zy.

We cannot influence gravity --- does this mean that we should not be interested in its nature?

 
"Execution cannot be pardoned?"
 
avtomat:


We can't influence gravity --- does that mean we don't need to take an interest in its nature?

Or should we build systems that take into account the possibility of a painful collapse...? in the presence of gravity - towards its source, rather than spend years trying to understand it... Understanding the nature of gravity won't make money. But from understanding what it acts on, we can already build some system in which the presence of gravity is an axiom. Otherwise, we may be stuck with theorems for another three years (look at the start date of this thread).
 
artmedia70:
Or do you build systems that take into account the possibility of a painful crash? ... ...in the presence of gravity - towards its source, rather than spend years trying to understand this process... Understanding the nature of gravity won't make money. But from understanding what it acts on, we will be able to build a system in which the presence of gravity is axiomatic. Otherwise we may be stuck with theorems for another three years (look at the start date of this thread).


That doesn't scare me ;)))
 
avtomat:

It doesn't scare me ;)))
It's the process that counts, not the result?
 
artmedia70:
It's the process, not the result, that counts?


We have a different understanding of the result.
 
avtomat:

We have a different understanding of the outcome.
Probably. For me, it's about creating a fairly stable income system.