The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 531
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I've read it and I'm getting ready:)
.
Everything requires skill,
Harden it up, train it up.
Know how to bide your time,
Know how to attack!
Whenever you fail
You've got to know how to fight back
Or else you'll never get lucky!
End of week 4. and Beginning of week 5.
.
People know how to flatter themselves, don't they? I can't take it back.
50% drawdown, only half of the opening balance, but it's drawing a 130% profit.
.
.
it seems that such a small percentage of mutations in bacteria is due to a balance between the rate of division and population size... very interesting. if there were more mutations, the probability of colony degradation and death would increase.
for organisms whose reproduction rate is low (such as humans), more mutations are required, as the authors of the film assert in humans it is 10-15%.
In artificial environments, such as optimization of functions and processes, as practice shows, the best value turns out to be 30-40% of mutations (maximum speed for best results) under condition that the "reset" mechanism is provided, that is, the random process shaking or "fresh blood" injection that does not allow population to stagnate on one side and forces to develop, and on the other side does not allow to be stumped by one of dead-end development branches.
it is a pity that human society cannot be "shaken up" in the same way, but that would be too inhumane.
The end of week 4. and the beginning of week 5.
Well,
it seems that such a small percentage of mutations in bacteria is due to the balance between the rate of division and population size... very interesting. if there were more mutations, the probability of colony degeneration and death would increase.
for organisms whose reproduction rate is low (such as humans), more mutations are required, as the authors of the film assert in humans it is 10-15%.
In artificial environments, such as optimization of functions and processes, as practice shows, the best value turns out to be 30-40% of mutations (maximum speed for best results) under condition that the "reset" mechanism is provided, that is, the random process shaking or "fresh blood" injection that does not allow population to stagnate on one side and forces to develop, and on the other side does not allow to be stumped by one of dead-end development branches.
It is a pity that human society cannot be "shaken up" in the same way, but that would be too inhumane.
Mutations are a murky and ambiguous subject in themselves, largely undefined.
Mutations are a murky and ambiguous subject in themselves and are largely uncertain.
Mutable because it is probabilistic. indeterminate because you never know in advance which mutation will prove useful.
the main thing is to avoid the bottle-neck effect in the gene pool, otherwise it's dead.
a large-scale infection that struck our ancestors 100,000 years ago may have contributed to the evolutionary isolation of our species, according to geneticists who resurrected two ancient proteins in the lab.
and 'marriages' to Neanderthals and Denisovans contributed, according to various estimates, up to 4% of the genes (responsible for the immune system) that modern humans have, more pronounced in Europeans and Asians.
cloudy - because it is probabilistic. indeterminate - because you never know in advance which mutation will prove beneficial.
The main thing is to avoid the bottle-neck effect in the gene pool, otherwise it's dead.
Protozoa, both living and non-living organisms such as bacteria and especially viruses, play no less of a role in evolution in general and humans in particular, making the gene pool more diverse and introducing useful changes to DnA. a large-scale infection that struck our ancestors 100,000 years ago contributed to the evolutionary isolation of our species, believe geneticists who resurrected two ancient proteins in the lab.
I think that with regard to mutations, the turbidity, ambiguity, and uncertainty lie much deeper. What is a mutation and what is not a mutation. What can be considered a mutation and what cannot be considered a mutation. Whether this boundary is invariable or this boundary depends on external and / or internal conditions. And so on and so forth.