You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The road is for those who walk.
I will make a small adjustment to the formula for calculating efficiency - to allow for changes in the prevailing conditions.
.
.
With such a formulation, the essence of the trader's effectiveness is expressed more precisely.
If, for example, for the whole period under consideration
1) no funds are withdrawn, and the balance value does not change, the efficiency of such operation equals zero
2) I did not withdraw any money, and the balance doubled, the efficiency of such work will be 100%.
3) funds withdrawn are equal to contributed funds and the balance size remained unchanged; the efficiency of such operation equals 100%
4) Withdrawal of funds equals to deposited funds and the balance doubled, the efficiency of such operation equals 200%
5) no funds have been withdrawn and the balance value has fallen to zero; the efficiency of such operation equals -100%
6) Withdrawals are equal to contributed funds and the balance value has dropped down to zero - the efficiency of such activity is equal to zero
etc.
I will make a small adjustment to the formula for calculating efficiency.
The market is a controlled dynamic system.
For example, the deposits of tractors A and B, in addition to the initial 500, were replenished with 200 each -- as a result they have 700 each
So at this point their efficiency (current value) is:
.
.
For example, the deposits of tractors A and B, in addition to the initial 500, were replenished with 200 each -- as a result they have 700 each
So at this point their efficiency (current value) is:
.
.
I would recommend we forget about the word "balance" and consider only "equity" (means) and present equations reflecting dynamics of trading from this very point of view. The balance can be given as an abstract figure that does not mean anything, and you do not have to focus on it. Balance is nothing, funds are everything (c).
I don't agree with this twist.
First, only the withdrawn funds ("cache") are materialised. Second, both "balance" and "equity" are virtual. However, if the "balance" is virtual, then the "equity" is virtual twice as much, if I may say so ;)
I disagree with this twist.
First, only the withdrawn funds ("cache") are materialised. Second, both "balance" and "equity" are virtual. However, if "balance" is virtual, then "equity" is doubly virtual, if I may say so ;)
However, it is by "doubly virtual" equity that Nikolai Morzhov comes in... in no way just by the "virtual" balance.
Nikolai Morzhov, however, comes by the balance. The very fact of his arrival is, so to speak, a lowering of the degree of virtualisation ;)
Nikolai Morzhov comes in on balance after all. The very fact of his arrival is, so to speak, a downgrading of virtualisation ;)