Your most effective strategy? - page 4

 

Has anyone tested this strategy?

1. we open an order in the direction of the trend with equal SL and TP.

2. If the TP is triggered, we open an order with the same direction.

3) If the SL triggered, we change the opening direction etc. etc. round and round, without stopping.

 
Yes. But it wasn't Buffett (or he didn't become Buffett, whichever you prefer to read)
 
sergeev:

Yes. But it wasn't Buffett (or he didn't become Buffett, whichever you prefer to read)
But apparently he didn't go bankrupt either?
 
yosuf:
But apparently he didn't go bankrupt either?

That's debatable. Probably went bankrupt. More than once.
 
yosuf:

Has anyone tested this strategy?

1. open an order in the direction of the trend with equal SL and TP.

It's a good strategy))) Especially if you know in which direction the trend will continue and what the volatility will be, so stops do not get blown out)))
 
yosuf:

Has anyone tested this strategy?

1. we open an order in the direction of the trend with equal SL and TP.

2. If the TP is triggered, we open an order with the same direction.

3) If the SL triggered, we change the opening direction etc. etc. round and round, without stopping.


"monkey" classic
 
Vinin:

Now that's debatable. It's more likely to go bankrupt. More than once.
Describe then, roughly, the mechanism of bankruptcy in this case
 
abolk:

"monkey" classic
What are its disadvantages? Can it be improved?
 
yosuf:
Describe then, roughly, the mechanism of bankruptcy in this

He did not have a Sultonov indicator )))
 
yosuf:
What are its shortcomings? Can it be improved?

take the "monkey" - there is such a code on the forum - and check it out
Reason: