Curious observation: further observation required - page 3

 

No, but let's break it down)

Starting message: We are paranoid and don't trust anyone. How can we make sure that no EAs and indicators are sent to the DC server? The first thing that comes to mind is the volume of traffic, but it seems unreliable if the volume of tools is very small...

Any other options?

 
Figar0:

No, but let's sort it out)

You're gonna get banned too...
 
Figar0:

We're paranoid and we don't trust anyone. ...

Paranoid people are generally forbidden by doctors to connect to the internet.

)))

 
paukas:

And you trick him. You use for example EA "A", and you call it "B".

And the log will say that it's loaded with "B". Let them suffer.

Now I hope to buy your Expert Advisor from some brokerage company employee, because all stolen stuff is cheap))).

You will not get my Expert Advisor. I renamed it. ))))

 
Diger:

Now I hope to buy your advisor from some DC employee...

You won't buy it from just anyone. All advisors are sent upstairs to the director of forex, unprinted at once.

You have to ask him.

 
paukas:

You won't buy it from just anyone. All advisers go straight to the top - to the director of forex - unprinted.

You have to ask him.

+++))))
 
And yet, there's not much fun to be had...
 
Hopefully the developers will fix this unfortunate error in the terminal program.
 
Diger:
I hope the developers fix this unfortunate error in the terminal program.

An unfortunate? Mistake?

;)

Of what?

Your world view?

 
avatara:

An unfortunate? Mistake?

;)

Of what?

Your world view?

Are you insisting it was done deliberately?

To do it deliberately is to sign your sentence...

Don't make this sound too hard. Trader's trust in the program is as important as the trust of the broker.