What form, let's assume a physical body, does time have? Your opinion. - page 45

 
prikolnyjkent:


Well, what did it explode?

Or, as Piglet said, "I wonder what it is... ...that boom?"...


theoretically - nothing :) well, or something opulent, but compressed into a small point, as one of the options - a black hole burst, which once sucked into itself everything possible, due to gravity shrinking into a super small and super dense object and due to some conditional critical density, exploded, well, energy scattered in all directions, and from it arose matter and the rest


but in fact nobody knows anything, what they know is 1. the universe is expanding/spreading out, it has almost been proved and it can be tracked by redshift of distant objects

time as the 4th dimension - is not proven, so it is not correct in principle to speak about its form, however, if it is a part of space, even if it is +1+2+3 dimensions, it does not matter, then we may speak about similarity of form, for example, as a circle is similar to a sphere...

 
Kalkin:

theoretically - nothing :) well, or something opulent, but compressed into a small point, as one of the options - a black hole exploded, which once sucked into itself everything possible, due to gravity shrunk into a super-small and super-dense object and due to some conditional critical density, exploded, and, respectively, energy flew in all directions, and from it arose matter and the rest


but in fact nobody knows anything, what is known is 1. the Universe is expanding/diverging, it is almost proved and can be tracked by redshift of distant objects

time, as the 4th dimension - is not proven, so it is not correct to speak about its form in principle, however, if it is a part of space, even +1+2+3 dimensions, it does not matter, we can speak about similarity of form, for example as a circle is similar to a sphere


And what do you hear about a nuisance called "BEFORE THE EXPLOSION"...?

Before the explosion, did these storytellers come up with anything,... or is their imagination enough only for AFTER?...

 
prikolnyjkent:


And what do you hear about a nuisance called "BEFORE the explosion"...?

Before the explosion, did those storytellers come up with anything... or do they only have imagination for AFTER?...

There was no explosion, it's clear as day.
 
moskitman:
There was no explosion, plain as day.


Oh!...

And now, please tell me, WHY is this "explosion" ALWAYS imposed on the people by means of mass brainwashing? Do "they" take the people for a completely stupid cattle, not even bothering to make up at least a little more believable story?

 

I've been asking for a long time. Where and on what was this dot before the explosion and how long was it there?

It was so small that it wasn't there at all.)) And there was no place for it to lie.))) Come to your senses! Look around you! You're being fooled.

Same problem with the expansion. Finding the SS as a point of reference to determine the expansion of the universe. It's nothing more than that.

There's a lot of interesting information in the world. But it's not for everyone. The rest is like BW for everyone.

 
no one knows anything for sure, and can't know, it was too long ago, and there was an explosion, but then again, hypotheses - was it in the void and what was that void and what was before that and is the notion of "before that" correct, did time itself exist?
 
Kalkin:
no one knows anything for sure, and can't know anything, it was too long ago, and the explosion was there, but here again, hypotheses - was it in the void and what was that void and what was before that and in general, is the concept "before that" correct, the time itself existed?


No one knows. Maybe we in the visible world are in the substance like fish in water and there is another medium where our eye has not yet reached.

There is nothing to compare the density with.)))

 
prikolnyjkent:


Wo!...

Now, please tell me, WHY is this "explosion" being ALWAYS thrust upon the people by means of mass brainwashing? Do "they" take the people for a completely stupid cattle, not even bothering to make up at least a little more believable story?

exactly

P.S. though I admit they are genuinely wrong

 
moskitman:
exactly


Truth is not an honour! Faith is needed so that one does not think about the rest! ;))
 
borilunad:

Truth is not honoured! Faith is needed so that one does not think about the rest! ;))

A little wrong, Boris.

The world economy is based on hydrocarbon energy. It only seems that other sources can solve the problem, but in reality there will be uncontrollable chaos.

That is why the authorities have to keep the "cattle" in the dark, financing only the "right" scientific developments.