What form, let's assume a physical body, does time have? Your opinion. - page 7

New comment
 
Tantrik:
Probably not. And if you look at it from the physical side, there is no time. Not at all, time is an invention of man. (I might add - there are eternally existing entities about them saying never was born - but this is also unproven).

How to expand on that thought. Actually full enlightenment means full knowledge as well. 5000 years ago the Buddhists wrote about the creation of the world - the Absolute concentrated in the Absolute and uttered Om.(actually the theory of the origin of the universe). How many Teachings are serious, how many are mythical... (here for example in ancient India lived Siddhis, they could control energy - to leave imprints on stones, to fly etc.), and teleportation or materialization of physical objects.

Let it be unproven, in fact no one ever controlled time (not even the gods).

 
LeoV:
My thought was that maybe this topic of discussion is how the nature of market movements, thereby how patterns change, over time?

Can you not drag patterns into a serious topic? (Thanks in advance.)
 
Any physical property has a maximum and a minimum value. Does time have?
 
Tantrik:


Let it be unproven, in fact no one has ever controlled time (not even the gods).

Of course it is not proven, we have only one fact, people are so inventive, just a game of broken phone, and I will not even talk about 5000 years of jokes ))

Time can be controlled locally and by definition cannot be controlled globally as the particles are basically unconnected.

 
Techno:
what's wrong? This was all discovered in the last century
A black hole is zero-dimensional - that's why it is a hole: it exists in all adjacent spaces and its properties are different in each of them.
 
LeoV: My thought was that maybe this topic of discussion is how the nature of market movements, thereby how patterns change, over time?
Perhaps I should introduce you to my theory of patterns. According to this theory they cannot work properly, unfortunately.
 
tara:
A black hole is zero-dimensional - therefore it is a hole: it exists in all adjacent spaces and its properties are different in each of them.
A hole is just such a name given just at the time of its discovery. A black hole is just a dense body formed by the contraction of matter during the explosion of a star. And there is no such thing as "adjacent" space. There is only one space. You've just seen too many sci-fi movies.
 
Techno:
a hole is just the name given to it at the time of its discovery. A black hole is simply a dense body formed by the contraction of matter during the explosion of a star. And there is no such thing as "adjacent" space. There is only one space.
We certainly have one. And a black hole physically exists in any adjacent space. Unlike, for example, one-dimensional space, which coincides with the boundary of two two-dimensional ones.
 
tara:
We, of course, have one. And a black hole physically exists in any adjacent space. Unlike, for example, one-dimensional space, which coincides with the boundary of two two-dimensional ones.
And what makes you think that there are any adjacent spaces, where is the proof ?
 
Techno:
And what makes you think that there are some contiguous spaces, where is the proof ?

When two neutrons come close to a certain distance, they start interacting with a force inversely proportional to the 5th power of the distance (not the second according to Grandpa Coulomb). But the peep is in the change of sign - they repel, the buggers!

Changed two key words to remove ambiguity related to chargeability of particles.

1234567891011121314...67
New comment