You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, it's obvious that you can't, but you have to prove it if you think you can.
Good proof, nothing to say ))
It's obvious-unbelievable.
Good proof, nothing to say ))
Straightforward obvious-unbelievable.
))
You can't because it's SB and any channels are also random, unlike CD, where channels if not rule, at least participate as a behavioral pattern, and in SB there can't be behavioral patterns by definition
So why is it possible on SB?
Courage Vladimir, this is a Nobel Prize at least
))
You can't because it's SB and any channels are just as random as CD, where channels are at least involved as a behavioural pattern if not ruled, whereas SB can't have behavioural patterns by definition
So why is it possible on SB?
I once showed it to a friend. So he looked and looked and finally said, that I have a bad READ, not really random ))
Do you have a normal one?
I showed it to a friend once. So he looked and looked and finally said that I have a bad CRT, not really random ))
Do you have a normal one?
I don't have one, everyone uses some popular C, but the MT one will probably do
I don't have one, everyone's using some popular C
You do that and you get a Nobel Prize. Would you like to try it on a temperature graph? Or is there a "behavioural component" there too?
The temperature graph isn't SB.
You dodged the proof.
The temperature graph is not SB
You have dodged the proof.
I didn't say anything to prove it.
The temperature graph is not SB? What's SB?
And I did not assert anything that I have to prove.
Nah, that's not fair, you're winding me up, I'm offended.
I wonder how you can interpret your answer to Alexei differently.
Nah, that's not fair, you're winding me up, I'm offended.
I wonder how else to interpret your answer to Alexei
His assertion requires proof.
Proofs like.
"it can't be because it can never be"
"because it's obvious."
"because it's heavier than air"
are unfortunately not admissible.