Avalanche 6.2 - page 4

New comment
 

I put my version of Avalanche in https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9880
Have a look at it and see if it comes in handy.

On demo and history all ok. Put it on real, fingers crossed =)

 
wmlab:

I put my version of Avalanche in https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9880
Have a look at it and see if it comes in handy.

On demo and history all ok. Put it on real, fingers crossed =)


what is original about it? Is your version different from the "classic" apart from the netting?
 
sever30:

what is original about it? How does your version differ from the "classic" apart from the netting?
The differences and reasons for the changes are given in the description.
 
EvgeTrofi:

Unfortunately I don't have anything better. What about you? Do you have a more stable and profitable trading system?

You're asking tricky questions. )) I don't know what I've got...

But you can take this one as an example:

https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/131

The profitability is almost the same, but the slippage is several times less.

 
wmlab:
Differences and reasons for changes are given in the description.

The author's thoughts are not visible there...
 
Piccioli:

You're asking tricky questions. )) I don't know what I've got...

But you can take this one as an example:

https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/131

The profitability is almost the same, but the slippage is several times less.

Interesting article. If I understand the idea correctly, are we talking about a floating blocking of part of the deposit?
 
Galina:


SO WHERE IS IT ?

Would love to see....

Here's a link to Avalanche V63. There's also a report from a working demo account.
 
zhuki:
Here's a link to Avalanche V63. There's also a report from a working demo account.


No, you don't! Don't!

Even the versions that Dmitry and I posted on the previous "Lovina" thread work much more correctly, in my opinion :)

Sorry for the insensitivity.

 
Galina:


No Ear! No need!

Even the versions that Dmitry and I posted on the previous "Lovina" thread work much more correctly, in my opinion :)

Excuse my tactlessness.

And what don't you like about the 63? The previous ones, I agree, are rubbish, but I like the 63.
 
zhuki:
What's not to like about the 63? The previous ones, I agree, but I like the 63.

Strategy Tester Report
Avalanche V_63
UWC-Demo.com (Build 226)

Symbol EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period Day (D1) 2009.01.01 00:00 - 2009.05.29 00:00 (2009.01.01 - 2009.06.01)
Model All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest timeframes available)
Parameters Lot=0.01; Dist=25; Pribyl=5; K_Martin=2; Risk=1; Max_in_Lots=16; Tral_Step=5;
Bars in history 1107 Modelled ticks 2484181 Simulation quality n/a
Chart mismatch errors 8638
Initial deposit 10000.00
Net profit -5009.41 Total profit 51381.16 Total loss -56390.58
Profitability 0.91 Expected payoff -14.03
Absolute drawdown 5009.42 Maximum drawdown 17590.49 (77.90%) Relative drawdown 77.90% (17590.49)
Total trades 357 Short positions (% win) 177 (63.28%) Long positions (% win) 180 (75.00%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 247 (69.19%) Loss trades (% of all) 110 (30.81%)
Largest profitable trade 6885.65 losing deal -20062.99
Average profitable deal 208.02 losing deal -512.64
Maximum number continuous wins (profit) 9 (448.76) continuous losses (loss) 1 (-20062.99)
Maximum Continuous Profit (number of wins) 6885.65 (1) Continuous loss (number of losses) -20062.99 (1)
Average continuous winnings 2 Continuous loss 1
IT'S BEAUTIFUL, IT'S BEAUTIFUL.
1234567891011...19
New comment