Avalanche 6.2 - page 11

 
EvgeTrofi:

It depends on which one. What is the name of the EA you want to run?

Avalanche v6.3
 
Galina:


I want to disappoint the naysayers :)

I trade an avalanche, a real one, the previous thread was full of these versions and even had invoices on display.

I haven't traded with my hands for probably a year now, only bots.

I have to say I have never found a nicer robot than LAVINA.

I have never found a BOTTOM better than LAVINE, and I should say I have never found a BOTTOM better.

I have made a conclusion for myself.

There is nothing better than an avalanche.

Everything else comes and goes, and an avalanche is and will be.

And my accounts are proof of that.

You said yourself that it has leaked from you and more than once...
 
sllawa3:
You yourself wrote that it was losing from you more than once...


Everyone sees what he wants to see :)

I didn't actually write only about plums, read carefully.

I was saying that there are two versions of the bot,

One takes off like a plane with a high risk of total flush.

And the second is sedate and smooth, even gave specific numbers. He's still trading.

Although on the first one, I'm on the whole in the black, about 330-360%.

 
Galina:

I trade in an avalanche, a real one, and the previous thread was full of such versions and even posted invoices on the show.


Galina, when will you post the investor's password to look at your account, because so far it's just words?

You promised that in the "Where have the avalanche victims gone" thread.

 
genfed:

Galina, when will you post the investor's password to look at your account, but so far only words?

You promised it in the "Where have the avalanches gone?" thread.

You don't have a Piglet-Pig on you...

Is it not clear that a "totally" random entry will give the same result.

It's fun to admire in the demo and in the batter.

;)

Enchanted by randomness...

And the research script has long been published.

It's "enchantment" there too.

 

How many (many - not few?) more times will it be...

I'm not a sociologist, but someone has asked a similar question, right?

 
Galina:


I want to disappoint the naysayers :)

I trade an avalanche, a real one, the previous thread was full of these versions and even had invoices on display.

I haven't traded with my hands for probably a year now, only bots.

I have to say I have never found a nicer robot than LAVINA.

I have never found a BOTTOM better than LAVINE, and I should say I have never found a BOTTOM better.

I have made a conclusion for myself.

There is nothing better than an avalanche.

Everything else comes and goes, and an avalanche is and will be.

And my accounts are proof of that.

So where are these accounts?
 
goldtrader:
So where are these accounts?

Look a bit further afield :)
 
Gone looking :)
 

I didn't think I'd be interested in Avalanche either, but alas ... :)

As for the subtext: the avalanche is useful if you set the initial direction not by chance but taking into account the indicators, the avalanche channel is useful if you set not a static but dynamic, the avalanche is useful if you trawl the profit, the avalanche is useful if you manage MM properly (you should also know how to lose)

i have been testing this code on demo for 24 hours - the result is very impressive, a screenshot from the tester at https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9878 - this code was used as a base

So far, but I will be reworking the code, thanks to PPC for the code