Help is needed to get the "Russian Fires 2010" portal up and running quickly. (russian-fires.ru). - page 34
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Maps and weather stations are for weather. Climate is a bit different.
And, in fact, the type of system has little to do with it. Either one begins to itch when it "bites". Both ours and theirs.
The Finns have about a third of their private forests insured, draining peat bogs is out of the question, there are even no mosquitoes in such wild numbers as we do, nature is pristine and everything is balanced
Finns have about one third of their private forests insured, there is no question of draining peat bogs, there are even no mosquitoes in such wild numbers as here, nature is pristine and everything is balanced.
Maps and weather stations are for weather. Climate is a bit different.
The Finns have about one third of private forests insured, draining peat bogs is out of the question, there are even no mosquitoes in such wild quantities as we have, the nature is pristine and everything is balanced
We should insure all burning forests.
Or renamed, as the President said.
It is obvious that burning forests are a grave legacy of the USSR.
That's the way to reduce fires to zero.
The right way.
We should insure all burning forests.
That way we can reduce fires to "nothing".
It is not funny, if the owner of the forest burns down, then it makes a big difference whether the forest was or was not insured.
The Finns have about a third of their private forests insured, draining peat bogs is out of the question, there are even no mosquitoes in such wild numbers as we have, nature is pristine and everything is balanced
And who is in charge of forest protection in these filthy sodbusters? The owners, insurance companies or the state?
It is not funny, if the owner of the forest burns down, then it makes a big difference to him whether the forest was or was not insured
I'm not talking about insurance, I'm talking about the fires themselves.
And who are the fucking sodbusters in charge of forest protection? The owners, the insurance companies or the state?
Mosquitoes in populated areas are dispersed by HF generators there, and there are a lot of bloodsuckers in the forests. They feed on moose there :)
I wonder what our mosquitoes eat between weekends, they are not mosquitoes, they are moose with trunks and wings
The Finns have about a third of their private forests insured, draining peat bogs is out of the question, there are not even as many mosquitoes as we have, nature is pristine and everything is balanced