We need a second head, or even two, like the Garrynych kite. - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I am not in the business of optimisation and I set it up on pictures in the interval of only 1 day.
Who is bigger? And please, a lay-out with formulas!
E=mC^2;
I=U/R;
Petya+Masha=Love;
S=V*t;
With what formulas, what deduction? Or are you - about needing to comment on my imho?
I am a dummie in programming, so I simplify tasks, e.g. by addition or subtraction. You can also multiply by "weight". Example in an indicator
You can simplify or complicate, that is not the question, but what is it all for, is it worth it? If with complication you can achieve better results, then it is, as they say, a matter of technology, there are no particular problems, it is only a question of time, but is it worth spending the time on it, this question remains open.
And I come to the conclusion of my inability to formulate clear rules for the "transformation" into an automaton. Is this related to my qualification ?
No. Initially, practically no one can do it. I have only known two people who seemed to me to be devoid of this flaw.
The only question is how quickly a specialist is able to get rid of it in each episode. It is not a qualification, but a profession. It can certainly be mastered.
E=mC^2;
I=U/R;
Petya+Masha=Love;
S=V*t;
With what formulas, what deduction? Or are you talking about the need to comment on my imho?
Wow, I like the third formula best! Well, a comment on imho would be nice.
I altered a lot of TS on my own complicated indicators, but one problem I cannot overcome, TS show high efficiency, but on short intervals of history. I do not do optimization, and it is difficult to optimize my indicators, too many variable parameters, I created new and new TS with different strategies, trying to find a stable in a wide range, but so far I have not succeeded. I have decided to try the most primitive one with one mouse, the working range is much wider, but indicators are very low compared to previous versions. Question in the studio: is there any prospect of refining such a TC, or according to the experience of experienced people such a TC has no chance?
In my experience, there is no chance.
But who cares? Would you listen to such statements?
So I wish you good luck and gain your own experience).
You can simplify or complicate, that is not the question, but what is it all about, is it worth the effort? If you can achieve better results by making it more complicated, then it is, as they say, a matter of technique, there are no particular problems with it, just a question of time, but whether it is worth spending time on, this question remains open.
Wow, I liked the third formula best! Well, a comment to imho wouldn't hurt either.
Easy!
As purely an imhil by Rev. Granit77, gut knows how to account for session boundaries - that's one.
gut knows how to account for session boundaries - that's one.
Easy!
As purely an imhil by Rev. Granit77, gut knows how to account for session boundaries - that's one.