Avalanche - page 430
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If I wanted to use this method, I would have to re-calculate the drawings and fill them with new orders. Here is a screenshot, you can see that mathematically there are no equal parts of the trend/minitrends, interestingly TS Avalanche from the point of view of the first failed entry - wrong entry = reverse, the system of averaging losses with Martingale also satisfies, but does not suit some confidence that the profit should be cut at some distance - distance
If Mr. Brainard can show me a calculation where profitable orders can be left in the market and filled by new ones - big thanks, but the losses can be kept locked in or cut with SL
HH: ABCD tops can be predicted with some accuracy, the only question is WHEN the price will be there it is unlikely to predict with great accuracy, i.e. the Avalanche version with asymmetrical distances for SELL and BUY orders is interesting
what if there is a recoil motion?
HI: ABCD tops can be predicted with some accuracy, only question is WHEN price will be there unlikely to be predicted with great accuracy, i.e. the Avalanche version with asymmetric distances for SELL and BUY orders is interesting
Not good, but rather rare. The solutions are obvious - choose weakly volatile instruments, do not trade before the news or at all during the day - strong moves are unlikely at night, or place orders wider by increasing the step between the levels.
for the first time admitted the obvious... and thank you for that
There is such a thing as "gamer psychology". The computer gamer knows that despite a seemingly hopeless situation, there is a solution - after all, in any game one can win. And he does not stop, but continues to look for a way to move on, and having found it, wins. The same can be done in life. Classical Avalanche does not like a flat, so to circumvent this problem was created Auto-Lavina. It does not like flat trends but statistically flat and backwards occur more often than strong trends, so if you choose the right instrument and time to trade it is easy to achieve fast and lossless growth of your deposit.
Another rebranding of the opium of the people.
Catch, Anti-Catch, Auto-Catch, Rabbit Indicator ... everything you need to supposedly make money ))))
Gurney, who do you work for? Admit it at last.
Or make at least one real account and show in practice how your magic tools work.
Stop bullshitting me.
The price reversal places or step pullback don't need to be guessed - my Rabbit indicator, which makes a markup for the day ahead, has long been available for that.
It does the markup, but I can't trade by this markup with my hands or code - it's been done, you can take offense - Rabbit indicator , ga.noga still, better Privalov grid - at least it has some logic than in your Rabbit or any Pivot Point
For the sabbath, stop wracking your brains - do you have variations on the Zig-Zag and Super Lavin? Can we keep it simple - I will be satisfied with a correct MM with SL calculation in case of a no return?
ZZZ: Go back through the topic, I have already posted the calculation of dynamic corridors for Avalanche orders for lasso - you may use it - the system works fine
ZS: I remember lasso and the topic about the casino, for which he got a ban - I think there are no random accidents: topics with avalanches / martins around the web are multiplying and not deleted, I think a discussion of casinos and game theory can be moved to this thread with impunity ;)
When I look at the chart, I feel like the Rabbit indicator is better than the Pribal grid - it has some logic than your Rabbit or any Pivot Point.
For the sabbath, stop wracking your brains - do you have variations on the Zig-Zag and Super Lavin? Can we keep it simple - I will be satisfied with a correct MM with SL calculation in case of a no-swerve move?
ZZZ: Go back through the topic, I have already posted the calculation of dynamic corridors for Avalanche orders for lasso - you may use it - the system works fine
ZS: I remember lasso and the topic about the casino, for which he got a ban - I think there are no random accidents: topics with avalanches / martins around the net multiply and are not deleted, I think a discussion of casinos and game theory can be moved to this thread with impunity ;)
What else can be preempted with "impunity"?
Suicides can't be stopped
... I may do the same in real life. Classical Avalanche does not like flat, so to circumvent this problem we created the Auto-Lavina. But statistically flat and backwards occur more often than strong trends, that is why if you choose reasonable instrument and trading time you may easily achieve quick and profitable growth of your deposit.
As for the avalanche. Whole read and 'recycled' the thread. Such information would have helped me a lot in my time for research.
I have created algorithms for my variants of a netting avalanche (based on an Expert Advisor, previously posted in this branch by Murad Ismaylov - thanks to him).
Currency pair is EURUSD. Used timeframe = 5 min. Entry by trend (I use the daily candlesticks + price break of a fractal on M5 in the direction of the daily trend). Start lot is fixed at 0.1. The channel is dynamic - by APR. Coefficients of multiplication of subsequent volumes at reversals (iterations) are as follows: 5-4-3-2-2-2... i.e. resulting lots: 0.1; 0.5; 2; 6; 12; 24... Trawl from the 1st iteration (one of variants) in the attached file (StrategyTester.htm) - 80 pp. TR = 74 points. - one of the options. The 2 biggest nods of the balance down are the 12 lot entry - 4 iterations (flips). Details of the different options are in the "avalanche rules and guidelines" (in the attached file). I deliberately removed the nicknames (some of the slices from the forum are there), to avoid silly questions. Other than that there are: Av02.mq4 - basic version with random entry of netting avalanche variant; DetailedStatement_Lavina.htm - detailed report when trading on a demo account from the beginning of December, 2010 several avalanches - drawdowns (as well as rises) of the chart are due to the simultaneous action of several similar systems with different settings (the channel size (either stationary or dynamic (by ATP), the number of flips (iteration), from which trawl) - trawl in all on fractals + indent - different, the ratios of domination are all the same (report purity is not 100%, because the machine from time to time.In December, the machine was shut down from time to time overnight, new variants were connected), start in all - 0.1 lots; Avalanche 05.01 - screenshot.
P.S. on the real account I traded on CHFJPY (by my calculations the risks were minimal for this pair - 3 iterations in maximal tests from Jan 1 to Nov 1, 2010) in November 2010 on wet algorithm for the real account, there were max 3 reversals (besides trades on both demo and real account - one in one - or the difference in a few points, the tester with a demo - beats.) Now I am refining the algorithms...