Avalanche - page 152
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Oh... I can't take it now... After I read the first post, I realized that Einstein is having a rest... he's got it all figured out. I do not understand what the essence of TC ... May be further on the branch explained ... but the first post do not understand everything so abstruse.And you thought it was easy for us kings?)
... в одном деце не может быть положительной разницы в свопах она всегда будет в -. Я не знаю таких ДЦ где бы по одной паре была положительная разница в свопе. Ни один ДЦ такого не допустит. ...I can't advertise it as Danish one and there are no lots there, you may buy or sell, of course you may use forwards instead of spot or options to hedge, but for such pairs where swap is positive in both directions (Hungarian forint for example, I know for sure almost all crosses are positive) forwards and options are absent...
I agree that pure avalanche cannot be used as a ready-made system. To make it work you need a pair with no spread and 1 pip corridor. Only then you may maintain a reasonable profit/loss ratio. An avalanche may well be used as a tool for handling complex situations. The corridor should be equal to two spreads, if there is pounddollar 2 pips, then it may even be a clean try. It's impossible to automate on my terminal, but I've managed to jump out by hand so far...
Both swaps are positive, show me. Screenshot, anything to see what's possible.
>> http://www.onlinebroker.ru/services/forex/tariffs/Respected people!
This kind of nonsense is not allowed. I can't get out from under the table. Read it:
JonKatana 15.04.2010 22:26
You are wrong. There is a difference and a very big one. Forex is much more profitable. In the casino, betting 100,000 rubles on red, you get your 100,000 back if you are lucky, plus another 100,000 winnings. Winning equals betting. Losing also equals betting. The odds are 50/50.
On Forex, by opening an order with a volume of 100,000 pawns, and guessing the direction, for example, of a weekly trend, you can earn 1,000,000 roubles. The winnings will be TEN times the initial bet! Maybe even more. And the loss is also equal to the initial bet. The chance is much higher. You can lose all week every day on the initial bet, and then one day to cover all the weekly losses and stay in profit!
This method of trading is called "coin" and is perfect for gamblers who do not want to learn the intricacies of Forex trading or for beginners. The profitability is much higher than betting in a casino on red/black.
JonKatana 15.04.2010 20:30
I totally agree. What's more - margin call trading is one of the classic ways described by all known authors. The idea is that you transfer some part of the deposit to your trading account - for example 10%. And you open an order with a huge volume - up to 80% of the trading account size. If the price moves even a small distance in a profitable direction - you lock in a very big profit. Then you withdraw the earned part to the external account and continue with the initial bet. And so on. If the price goes against you - you get a margin call, but it will be a loss of only a small part of the total (external) deposit. And the large profit, withdrawn several times, will more than cover the occasional loss.
JonKatana 15.04.2010 22:14
Why should the MC wait? Stops will not help in this case?
Who prevents you from "emulating" a margin call by placing a stop?
Stops will not help. If you have enough money left in your trading account to sustain a few stops - then there is a small amount of money that goes into collateral and the profits are also small.
If you open an order with a large volume, and set the stop loss level at a place where a regular margin call would trigger, then why do you need a stop loss? A margin call will close everything by itself.
----------------------------------
The author is on fire twice.
The first - he says that one should immediately enter with the whole deposit and if he loses, he needs to add money to the account from the margin and continue playing. In another post he says that if you have reserve money immediately in that account, it's bad as it doesn't work and there is no profit. I wonder if the author himself gives an account of what he has written or is it really a bot? I should have a multiple initial deposit somewhere, but not in this account.... under the bed probably...
Second - the author doesn't know what probability theory is at all, how casinos work, etc. He proposes to stupidly bet and lose $100 until you win for example $1000 and claims that there will be 9 losses and one profit will cover those losses. One. To lose 9 times, you have to have something to lose. Second. Who says (probably John) that a series of losses won't consist of 18 losses?
I am shocked at such illiteracy.
Here's another report on Lovina.
As you can see the maximum he was gaining was 2.56 lots.
It's not difficult to calculate how much money is needed for normal work.
So I also think the tool is quite usable.
The corridor should be equal to two spreads, if there is pounddollar 2 pips then you can even try clean. On my terminal automation is impossible, but I have managed to jump out by hand so far...
If I had thought about it, I looked at the history, and there long flat snakes on minutes very often occur, here at the beginning of one can fall down and with a corridor of 2 spreads to drain long and painfully, and the Kolya will approach with inevitability guillatine.
P.S. By the way, what is your coefficient of lot enlargement? Double overweight?
Приветствую !
Вот еще один отчет по "Ловине".
Как видите максимум что он набирал, это 2.56 лота.
Не сложно расчитать какой обьем Ден. средств необходим для нормальной работы.
Так что я так же считаю, инструментом вполне можно пользоваться.
Comrade khorosh, are we still fighting for the result, or have you already lost interest in the subject? ) Better yet, join Galina and me - the three of us, perhaps, it will be easier for us to make a really working tool? And in general, is anyone interested to see the Expert Advisor, which gives this result? Or is there no point in posting it?
Думал об этом, по истории посмотрел, а там длиннючие флетовые змейки на минутках очень часто встречаются, вот в начале такой можно попасть и с корридором в 2 спреда сливать долго и мучительно, а Коля будет приближаться с неотвратимостью гильятины.
П.С. Кстати, у Вас какой кооф. увелечения лота. Двойной перевес?
There is elementary threshold of volatility, by St.Dev. we filter it out and wait for Momentum, volatility never goes out at once and keeps for some time... What I mean is that 60-100 points range is a suicide mission, no capital is enough there.
I would say it is twice as much, but the narrower the range the lesser coefficient may be used. In general, if two cycles do not work, I scrap. I take a lock as an option. A moose is a moose, full stop. It's taken on the chest. The lock is an unfixed elk and while it hangs around the trader has the possibility to judge, to rebuild the technique and take profit on everyone.
I use pure avalanche very rarely, if I have no ideas. In general, I use it as an assistant when tactics start to go wrong. But, again, very carefully and never as the main source of income.
Is anyone at all interested in seeing the EA that produces this result? Or is there no point in posting it?
>> It is interesting. >> Let's go with the Expert Advisor.
In general, if you are not too difficult, describe the essence of the strategy at the current stage, I think it differs significantly from the original version proposed by JonKatana.