Avalanche - page 423
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Bots are bots :))
But the question is open....
An avalanche is cool! Except it would have to have a place to roll off to...
The avalanche is for those who believe in the Grail.
Looks like this Avalanche has been tried and tested by everyone.
And there are different reviews on these systems, tudasuda, swings, etc...
Here's an interesting thread on the subject
First, despite the fact that orders starting from the third are placed at a small distance from each other, the working corridor is 80 points and is located between orders 1 and 2. This is equivalent to opening an 80-point corridor in a classic "Avalanche". This is the only way they can be compared. Price is more likely to stay within the 80 point corridor than the 20 point corridor. In the latter case, it just has to shift 20-30 pips sideways and it may be there as long as it likes - it will not be making more U-turns in a small corridor.
Second, even if the number of reversals in a small corridor will be larger than in the initial working corridor, at the same deposit size "Avalanche 2", compared to a classic "Avalanche", allows you to handle a much larger number of reversals. For example, total order volumes on the channel borders in a classic "Avalanche" grow as follows: 0.10 - 0.20 - 0.40 - 0.80 - 1.60 - 3.20 - 6.40 - 12.80 - 25.60, and so on. This is a total of 7 reversals. For the same deposit in "Avalanche 2" with an excessive arithmetic progression (more favourable conditions than in the classic "Avalanche" - the distance to the break-even level decreases with every new order, allowing to make a profit quicker), the total volumes of the oppositely directed orders increase as follows: 0.10 - 0.20 - 0.30 - 0.50 - 0.70 - 1.00 - 1.30 - 1.70 - 2.10 - 2.60 - 3.10 - 3.70 - 4.30 - 5.00 - 5.70 - 6.50 - 7.30 - 8.20 - 9.10 - 10.10 - 11.10 - 12.20 - 13.30 - 14.50 - 15.70 - 17.00 - 18.30 - 19.70 - 21.10 - 22.60 - 24.10 - 25.70 and so on. This is 30 spreads! At the same deposit size. If to use fractional coefficients of increase (at which the level of breakeven remains on place), then at the same conditions "the Avalanche 2" allows to sustain about 50 reversals!
Can you post the EA ?
Can you post the advisor?
There's a lot of shit like that, like this one:
There's a lot of shit like that, like this one:
Can you put up an EA?
There is no public advisor for theAvalanche 2 algorithm.
What is LAVINA 2?
Is this some new method?
Do you want to tell me about it?