Avalanche - page 15
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I can also kill you with an investment password... in person!
Ну если рынок меняется очень быстро значит из истории ну никак нельзя определить размах на будущее. Ведь все меняется.
А если определить можно значит тест с 1999 должен работать.
But you are trying to run Avalanche (if you are testing it - no one has seen your EA, so so far all your claims are not proven by anything) by 1999, using the corridor calculated by 2009-2010. "Back to the future"? And if in 2011 the average daily EURUSD move will be 900 pips and therefore the spread between the levels will be 300 pips - will you also claim that "it should work in 1999"? That is not correct.
А вот здесь, если можно, немножечко поподробней (и я думаю, коллеги меня поддержат), уж очень животрепещущая тема.
What's the big deal - a hatchet to the wires, that's it! :)
I can also kill you with an investment password... in person!
Nah, that's a low blow.
Я написал периоды для тестирования - месяц, квартал, год. Читайте внимательно. Для прогона по 1999 году нужно рассчитать расстояние между уровнями для 1998 года. Как - я написал выше, используя индикатор Average True Range.
I see. You found a brilliant idea. And now you're ecstatic. You don't want to test it because you might lose your ecstasy.
You won't trade on it, either.
I don't know why you created the topic.
А вот здесь, если можно, немножечко поподробней (и я думаю, коллеги меня поддержат), уж очень животрепещущая тема.
This is irrelevant to the "Avalanche" discussion - there is already 80% of the flooding in the thread. Also, since the topic is "hot" for you and your "colleagues", it means that you have already encountered it in practice and understand that I am right. The specific methods are not that important - there are probably more of them than I know, and new ones are being invented all the time. The important thing is that you can only trade Avalanche manually.
О! Gotcha! :))) Make a run, with the parameters I stated above.
P.S. In my student days so teachers in the department during sessions:)
Это не относится к обсуждению "Лавины" - и так флуда в теме 80%. К тому же, раз для вас и "коллег" тема "животрепещущая", значит, вы уже сталкивались с этим на практике и понимаете, что я прав. Конкретные методы не так важны - их наверняка намного больше, чем знаю я, и постоянно изобретаются новые. Главное то, что торговать по "Лавине" можно только вручную.
If you follow your logic, you can only trade ANY profitable TS with your hands.
Remember what forum you are on and guess which one of the thread participants is the biggest clutterer?)))
===
No offense. I mean, you don't have to put people in a very rigid position. They are conscientious for the most part and do not deviate far. There are no obvious trolls.
... Главное то, что торговать по "Лавине" можно только вручную.
self-soothing ))) ...
Я вот ни фига программировать не знаю... покажите мне прогон по фунто/баксу за последние три года с расстоянием между ордерами в 20п. и кооф. увелечения лота:
Первый разворот - 0.01 / 0.02
Второй разворот - (0.01+0.03) / 0.02
Третий разворот - (0.01+0.03) / (0.02+0.06)
Четвертый разворот - (0.01+0.03+0.12) / (0.02+0.06)
Пятый разворот - (0.01+0.03+0.12) / (0.02+0.06+0.24) и так далее.
I don't have a continuous history of minutes. Therefore testing with 20 ppts makes no sense as it would be inaccurate.
On the first quarter of 2010 11 reversals - 1 time
10 reversals -1 time
9 U-turns - 3 times
a smaller number of U-turns does not matter for it can be considered relatively sane
Can't do with your ratios. I need to correct my Expert Advisor's mathematics, but I don't want to.
My Expert Advisor triples lots, while yours doubles them.
I do not see the point in testing it on a longer timeframe. I won't have less than 11 reversals.
If you need it VERY much I can re-do it on doubling. And run the first of the year. As soon as you explain why it is necessary. The number of reversals will not become less