A probabilistic neural network - page 6

New comment
 
Everything is posted here.
 
The selection is very good, but the neural networks are a mess...
 
Debugger >>:
Подборка очень хорошая, а вот с нейросетями пообломаетесь...

What is it?

 
Debugger >>:
Подборка очень хорошая, а вот с нейросетями пообломаетесь...

Arguments in the studio.

 

I've been trying to stabilise readings for over a year now...

Used MatLab and MathCad and Maple and Just Statistica and SPSS.

Not so good... I don't know what parameters Better used...

Only he knows that... As always - the truth is out there...

 
Debugger >>:

Я уже больше года пытаюсь стабилизировать показания...

Испльзовал и MatLab и MathCad и Maple и Просто Statistica и SPSS.

Нихрема... Не заню какие параметры использовал Better...

Это известно только ему... Как всегда-Истина где-то там...


why "what parameters"? or are you sure you've done everything else correctly?
 
I said you would.
 
Debugger писал(а) >>

... I don't know what parameters Better...... used

If we look at his results for the last year, we see that there are no profits. (((

 
goldtrader писал(а) >>

If we look at its results for the last year, we see that there is no profit. (((

So in order to prove that there are "no black lefties" :) it is enough that neither Debugger nor Batter have seen them?

;)

 

I'm not much versed in applying NS to the financial markets, but I can see that even super-specialists like Better fail to make consistent profits using their proprietary tools.

However, that does not mean that NS are useless. They are at least very difficult to use and the result is poorly predictable. IMHO.

A year without profit is an ordeal as long as financial markets are the main source of income.

1234567
New comment