A probabilistic neural network - page 4

New comment
 
Swetten >>:

https://www.mql5.com/go?link=http://filegu.ru//

https://www.mql5.com/go?link=http://files.mail.ru//


The first will do. The second won't.
 
joo please try on the first
 
joo >>:
http://narod.ru/disk/18212382000/%23%20NN.001.html

http://narod.ru/disk/18213080000/%23%20NN.002.html

http://narod.ru/disk/18216218000/%23%20NN.003.html

http://narod.ru/disk/18219169000/%23%20NN.004.html



EE...mmm...and what is this? 4 files of 5 mb...
 
gumgum >>:


ЭЭЭ...ммм... и что это такое? 4 файла по 5 mb...

It's already five. Then there will be six and so on, :)

There are 128 in total.

 
joo >>:

Уже пять. Потом будет шесть и т.д., :)

Всего их 128 штук


Christmas trees and needles!!! 128=2^7)))
 
joo:

It's great that you decided to post the entire bibliography,

But as someone who knows about networks, you understand that it's important to do more than just give access to information,

but I'd also like to assign a coefficient.

How would you rate each book on your list (at least 5,10,20 winners)?

Thanks in advance.

 
Evaluations are subjective: some people want one thing and others another. The way in which it is presented is also perceived differently. For example, one possible principle of evaluation is that material without source material is less valuable than with source material ;-). I think making a generalized rating of this list of literature is an impossible task, the only way out is to look for reviews on the web.
 
joo писал(а) >>

It's already five. Then there will be six and so on, :)

There are 128 in all.

Monsieur knows a thing or two about perversion.) There are file-sharing sites that allow more files. 4shared.com, for example. Or is the internet just weak?

 
marketeer >>:
Оценки - дело субъективное: кому-то нужно одно, а кому-то другое. Манера изложения тоже воспринимается по-разному. Например, один из возможных принципов оценки: материал без исходника менее ценен, чем с исходником ;-). Думаю, составление обобщенного рейтинга данного списка литературы - дело неподъемное, единственный выход искать рецензии в сети.

I agree, scores are subjective, but a lot of reviews from different experts is already a statistic,

I, for example, put Haykin in first place (as the most comprehensive and multifaceted publication),

I had to print it out (it's too boring to read 1,100 pages on a monitor).

1234567
New comment