Trading spreads on currencies. Spreader 2 - page 18
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Выложите результаты.Read the thread https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/124013 when using the virtual trading tester you can increase the testing of this EA many times over, and not to sit and wait for results in the real time, but to run with different parameters on the history.
автор,мысль нормальная тоже ставил на демку,но почему то не по всем валютам открывает кросс,а через раз.можете ввести проверку на открытие-эта версия должна быть более живучей.вставил блок закрытия убытка из SPREAD 3_1-при хеджировании кроссом результаты намного лучше-но не всегда их открывает.убыток по кроссу не может быть больше профита,так как лот меньше в 2 раза.спасибо
Try to test it with virtual trading tester (see above), yesterday I tried it both ways on EURUSD/GBPUSD/EURGBP if the charts have no holes in the history, I could not achieve better results. The 4th version has a drawdown limiter already and it already solves a lot. I think it is worth trying on futures.
Попробуйте потестировать его через тестер виртуальной торговли(см. выше), вчера пробовал и так и сяк по EURUSD/GBPUSD/EURGBP если графики без дыр на истории, то улучшения результата добится не удалось. В 4-ой версии уже есть ограничитель просадки и это уже многое решает. Думаю стоит попробовать на фючерсах.
all to the indicators folder, attach V_Equty to the EURUSD chart (history for all pairs should be downloaded), input parameters can be changed there in the code
all to the indicators folder, attach V_Equty to the EURUSD chart (history for all pairs should be downloaded), input parameters can be changed in the same code
Any results?
Есть результаты?
This is how the two EA variants behave under equal conditions.
Above modification with EURGBP, below v4. As we see the drawdown is different, but so is the profitability. To be more exact, it may not be in the first case, because of fixing of losses on EURGBP may exceed profits of EURUSD GBPUSD
(red - liquidity, blue - balance)
This is how the two EA variants behave under equal conditions.
Above modification with EURGBP, below v4. As we see the drawdown is different, but so is the profitability. To be more exact, it may not be in the first case, because of fixing of losses on EURGBP may exceed profits of EURUSD GBPUSD
(red - liquidity, blue - balance)
Thank you
although if you consider gaps......))On InstaForex
This EA should be placed on NZDJPY, entering AUDJPY in the seconds_instrument parameter
Put an EA on CHFJPY, entering GBPJPY in the seconds_instrument parameter
Put advisor on EURUSD, entering GBPUSD in the seconds_instrument parameter
Add an Expert Advisor to USDJPY, entering CADJPY in the seconds_instrument parameter
Input parameters:
Error is appearing on all pairs, except eurusd/gbpusd: "Contracts size not equals. Change instruments". What is the problem?