Trading spreads on currencies. Spreader 2 - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Or at best, the minus will always be equal to the plus...
That's kind of silly, isn't it?
You can never get out of a slump, can you?
а я отвечал вот на эту фразу- "Сегодня профита можно не ждать"
"It's always the last phrase that counts" :)
Well, I agree with RISK that some of the people here are not quite up to speed with the maths. I am too lazy to quote. Well, how can you put in the parameters of the lot 0.01? 8-) How do you propose to calculate the lot size of the second pair????? As I understand five digits 100.00 lots is acceptable for the optimal calculation. yes 8-)I don't quite understand what the initial deposit was ????.
And it turns out, as I see it, that it only fixes profitable trades (where pairs start to go in the plus), and the minus remains in the account.
I have not got the feeling that I am getting lots of losses.
If i have tested it i should have kept it for at least one week. I would like to make a sampling of profitable pairs at the end of the test.
By the way, they do not increase, but go very close to profit, i.e. more loss, more profit. >> I am watching.
I agree with RISK. >> I'm too lazy to quote. How do you put 0.01 lot in the parameters? 8-) How do you propose to calculate the lot size of the second pair????? As I understand five digits 100.00 lots is acceptable for the optimal calculation. yes 8-)
I just put 0.01 for fun.
I am well aware of the need to balance pairs.
I just wonder how the EA will behave in this situation.
Well the fact that the maths is not quite right with some of the people here I agree with RISK. >> I'm too lazy to quote. How do you put 0.01 lot in the parameters? 8-) How do you propose to calculate the lot size of the second pair????? As I understand five digits 100.00 lots is acceptable for the optimal calculation. yes 8-)
I don't care what it is... I only believe in the profits.
Первый почин на новом советнике:
5774159 2010.02.15 07:43 buy 8.67 gbpusd 1.5653 0.0000 0.0000 2010.02.15 08:36 1.5645 0.00 0.00 0.00 -693.60
5774164 2010.02.15 07:43 sell 10.00 eurusd 1.3599 0.0000 0.0000 2010.02.15 08:36 1.3583 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 600.00
или Sell EUR/GBP.
I don't understand the difference either, at first glance trading crosses and waiting for a profit. It's like that at first glance, just in case I ran it on the same pairs as in the example
Sometimes it's better to remain silent and pass off as an idiot than to dispel a mitten like this and dispel the last doubts about your own worthlessness....
You're right on point :) Appreciate the self-criticism in people :)
You seem to be the only person who's "on topic". You wrote it right. And about the cross trade too. I wrote the same to Reshetov a long time ago (in the last thread), but all I heard in response was that I was a freeloader. This Reshetov is just a sucker, since he still does not understand all the subtleties of statistical arbitrage ...
Well, here's what he's been posting trades on EURUSD and GBPUSD in my opinion... - EURGBP - does it look a lot like a sine wave? No, there are big trends... Hence the conclusion...
I kept thinking what to call in short the necessary and sufficient condition for such an approach, exactly - a cross sine wave. I wanted to write here and there - but it's not Forex anymore :), so I had to invent it using an example with economic news.
It is funny, but judging by the latest posts the crowd has not understood anything anyway.
And this thread https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/122468 is the standard of obscurantism :)
...
or Sell EUR/GBP.
...
I kind of don't understand the difference either.
What lot?