![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Параметры, кажется, не написали. Пара: фунтйена, ТФ-М30. По ценам открытия. По порядку: 0.1 / 26 / 26 / 0 / 0/ 10 / 20 / 1 / 1 / 9800 / 27400 / 1440. Депо - 10 000,0. ТП и СЛ указаны для пятизнака. Параметры секретных индикаторов не оптимизированы, взяты, в общем - то, "от балды".
Thank you for the EA. The code is simple. It is not correct to test by opening prices, because TP and SL are set. It should be done using all ticks. But TP and SL may not reach it, it will be closed by the signal.
6 parameters that can be optimised. If you dig around, you can find another 2 parameters that are hidden inside the code. Total: 8 parameters. That's too many. :(
Thanks for the EA. the code is simple. It is not correct to test by opening prices, because TP and SL are set. It should be set by all ticks. But it may not reach TP and SL, it will close on the signal.
There are 6 optimizable parameters. If we explore around we can find 2 more parameters, which are hidden in the code. Total: 8 parameters. A lot. :(
1. Testing by all the ticks produces the same result. With such parameters it simply does not reach TP and SL, I see.
2. we can easily and harmlessly remove selectable prices (let's leave both of them - clones or any other) and mods (any of them, too). Initially, the EA was like that. TF for Ma can be excluded, too. Day.
That's understandable. The question is... Does this "classic" trick work in the EA, or not? :)
Это понятно. Вопрос в другом... Работает этот "классический" приём в советнике, чи ни? :)
I can tell you straight away, without optimisation - It works.
To avoid confusion about quotes - four or five digits - insert the following code:
The 2 additional parameters I was talking about are levels for the indicator. where the decision to open/close position is made.
But here... I may have optimised incorrectly, but I excluded these parameters. The parameter of the indicator itself is enough. It adjusts quite well to levels.
This EA has not been developed for trading but for adjusting parameters of different indicators. It is incomparable as a signal indicator for the head. Now it is being polished in my free time and there are results. Added the same, "classic" indicator... that doesn't work :)
To avoid confusion about quotes - four or five digits - insert the following code:
OK. Thank you. Convenient, yes.
Helen писал(а) >>
This EA was not made for trading, but for picking parameters of different indicators. As an indicator for the head - peerless. It is now being polished in its free time and there are results. Added the same, "classic" indicator... that doesn't work :)
Remember what I wrote about earlier. You can't lose touch with the period being tested.
Remember what I wrote about earlier. You can't lose touch with the period being tested.
It's not quite clear why it was mentioned in this context. Please, explain. I don't have any complaints about the performance of optimized indicators on all TFs. Or maybe you mean the Expert Advisor you are modifying?