Doubling your deposit with martingale in three days - a reality? - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
it does not matter the number of instruments. With martingale, whatever it is, the appearance of the chart is specific. Plus it was written that bets go 1-2-4-8 - the usual build-up. Once again I assert: The chart has nothing to do with martingale.
Don't be categorical. I firmly believe otherwise (I have my own charts).
Well, I won't tell you all the secrets, because it's very simple...
the flat is calculated as an average...
of course, the probability, a temporary phenomenon, but it's a sin not to use it while it works...
Thanks a lot :) Good luck!
The trading account is frozen and the status informer is present on the home page + the current status of open positions is shown.
What I personally don't like is "Demo" in the information about the monitored account.
29 trades in a few hours of work cast doubt on the feasibility of your system for real money.
Justify the specificity of how a martingale chart should look like ?
If I find a picture, I'll send you a link and you'll know what I mean. Or maybe someone has it handy and will post it.
In the meantime, why do I need martingale? - In order to return one's total balance to its previous value (which it had before the losing trade) during the next profitable trade. The comeback due to increasing contracts is very sharp and occurs in one or several steps, depending on the number of losing trades. Also failures due to sharp increasing of contracts are sharp. Thus, the general view of the chart is almost a straight line going upwards continuously with sharp peaks downwards.
And your chart smoothly floating up and down is not related to martingale at all. The number of instruments used has nothing to do with it. It would just add the number of peaks down and that's it.
This is when the pitch is fixed. And it can be adaptive. And the build-up can be by a certain law, not multiplication. It can be lot selection for a group of trades at all.
I have nothing against martin now, although I don't suffer from it myself :)
justify the specificity of what a martingale chart should look like ?
Here (scroll down a bit) https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1481
more https://forum.mql4.com/ru/11667
feel the difference ?
This is with a fixed pitch. And it can be adaptive. And the build-up can be by a certain law, not multiplication. It can be lot selection for a group of trades at all.
I have nothing against martin now, though I myself do not suffer :)
I have nothing against martin right now, I suffer from it myself : : : : :.
martingale is pulling the minus out by the ears
That's not exactly true.
But I don't feel like debating it.
Here (scroll down a bit) https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1481
more https://forum.mql4.com/ru/11667
feel the difference ?
this is understandable, however, if you consider that one lot size, different stops and different prices per pip are used,
and that the pairs offset each other's losses on relatively unsuccessful stretches and multiply profits on relatively successful ones
for all pairs at the same time, you get the above chart...