An interesting game - who can understand from transaction history how an advisor works - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
wrong account.
FxPro.com-Demo2 server
demo account numbers from 1301583.
Or download from herehttp://www.fxpro.com/metatrader4
or substitute
What are we looking for anyway?
A combination of inbuilt indicators until the second coming?
So it looks like a bounce from a lower level inside a higher one and something else
Can I ask what time frame the EA works on?
Is it five minutes ? Is it ?
Can I ask what time frame the EA works on?
Is it five minutes ? Right ?
When it is m5, then openings and closings are usually multiples of 5, because it enters and exits by market and not by orders. Of course we can do it differently, analysing the 0-th bar (Close[0],High[0],Low[0]) but usually we don't do it because of incorrectness of testing on the history.
Most probably it is m1.
When m5, the openings and closings are usually multiples of 5 minutes, because it enters and exits by market and not by orders. Of course we can do otherwise, analyzing the 0-th bar (Close[0],High[0],Low[0]), but usually we do not do it because of incorrect testing on the history.
Most probably m1.
It doesn't necessarily have to trade on formed bars.
It doesn't necessarily have to trade on formed bars.
Well, that's what I wrote about and why they don't usually do that. Although TF is not important.
What are we looking for anyway?
A combination of inbuilt indicators until the second coming?
So it looks like a bounce from a lower level inside a higher one and something else
Not in principle, but already closer compared to the other versions.