"Trees don't grow to the sky" - page 6

New comment
 
alexx_v >>:

Дык оно ж как, Лёнь, хочется как лучше (читай - быстрее), а получается как всегда :))

---

А картина называется "Маржинальная торговля. Плечи. Почувствуйте разницу". :))


Вообще график за год, но не видно весь, и там и там старт с 1000 :) Стоит внимание обратить на ценовую шкалу,

в первом случае от 0 до "стотыщмильёнов" :)) во втором и так видно )

Мне лично импонирует очень плечо 1:1, по ряду причин, но это не для 100-, и даже не для 10,000-долларовых счетов, увы.


This is the classic effect of a reinvestment strategy going beyond the optimal f boundary.

I have a sharp negative reaction to this PAMM not because of the increased risks and not even because of those monstrous drawdowns, which in the future will lead to a complete loss of this PAMM with the probability of 1.00. What causes rejection is overall illiteracy of the manager about reinvestments and I think about the trading too. Before starting such a PAMM it would be nice to read some clever books or at least one, the very one from Ralph Vince.

In general, what kind of results can we talk about? A measly 2000% with a full-fledged depo and three critical drops? Here are examples of the right ultra aggressive reinvestment methodology:

http://www.alpari.ru/ru/pamm/intro/login/58529/

And of course the legendary one:

http://www.alpari.ru/ru/pamm/info/login/52938/

Although his recent work has not been as convincing.

Hats off to the grammatical managers who know what reinvestment is and how to prepare it. This PAMM is managed by illiterate nitwit and apparently a Forex junkie with experience. Apparently, the emergence of such a PAMM was largely due to the federal law banning gambling in Russia, except for special gaming zones. So these sick gamblers flocked to DCs. I apologise for the harsh tone, it's just that I've had enough of it... I can't look away from the puppyish delight of the simpletons.

 

Oh, come on! There have always been, are and will always be crooks like this. And there will always be a demand for their services as long as people exist.


Casinos and the like have nothing to do with it. Top of the line -- Medoff, Enron.


Or what else is out there?

 
But Medof had a classic pyramid scheme disguised as a fund. Meadowf is a scammer. And the owner of that pamphouse is just an illiterate but successful "trader". Still, he's not a crook or a criminal, which isn't so bad after all.
 

Well, maybe.

 

From +2053% to -92%. What do you think? Is this consistent with a depo load of 100% with a leverage of 1 to 100?

 
It looks like a martin. Periods of gains are even, but losses are collapsing.
 
LeoV >>:

От +2053% до -92%. Кто что скажет? Это закономерно с нагрузкой на депо в 100% при плече 1 к 100?

You think it's an accident? ))

 

Only earnings can be accidental, but not a drain. Excluding, of course, the unlawfulness of the DCs.

 
I found it - it's maxzav. It's the same one I created a thread about myself :)
 
alexx_v писал(а) >>

You think it's an accident? ))



I don't know..... I was just asking who thinks what.
12345678910111213...87
New comment