You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
+ ExpensiveBuyer - now in heavy drawdown - there's also a larger amount I've already poured into it.
It seems that here, too, we are witnessing the demise of the grand monster of the PAMM industry:
Or that it is really not possible to make money on forex in the long term.
Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, when it should be the other way round.
How to avoid this problem?
Apparently, here too, we are witnessing the demise of the grand monster of the PAMM industry:
Well-o-o-o-o-o... This is HZ, HZ.... :-)
Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, when it should be the other way round.
How do you avoid this problem?
Well, why not... :-)
I poured at the drawdown, because the roll was 1 time per day, so the money came right out of it.
So, everything is good here - buy lowers, sell tops, the system is counter-trend... :-)
If the trend has begun, it will continue ... :-)
1. Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, although it should be the other way round.
2. How do you avoid this problem?
1. After all, I didn't go out on the August snot because there was - A SYSTEM... :-) In twenty-four hours - shot and all is well... :-)
You do not have it now, that is all.
You have to have your own system of trading and investing.
Well, why not... :-)
I was filling up on the drawdown, because the roll was once a day, so the money came right out of the drawdown.
So, all is well here - we buy the bottoms, sell the tops - the system is a counter-trend system... :-)
If the trend has begun, it will continue ... :-)
Everyone must find the answer for himself. I cannot make final conclusions on the basis of other people's plums, imho. But when I will withdraw my real, I will be closer to an answer.)
I can guess which answer you will be closer to.
Still on the strength of the logical assertion one might ponder, to paraphrase:
Not one of a thousand known attempts by mice to get cheese in a mousetrap has succeeded and always ended in the death of the mouse. Does it mean that the cheese in a mousetrap is relatively safe and the success of 1001 mice does not depend on the sad experience of their predecessors?
I can guess which answer you will be closer to.
Still on the strength of the logical assertion one might ponder, to paraphrase:
Not one of a thousand known attempts by mice to get cheese in a mousetrap has succeeded and always ended in the death of the mouse. Does it mean that the cheese in a mousetrap is relatively safe and the success of 1001 mice does not depend on the sad experience of their predecessors?