Evidence of hacking - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The article can be attributed. The software is not. According to Russian laws, the algorithm is not patented, so it is impossible to prove its authorship.
Z.I. But it still will not cancel your attack on the man and false accusations against him. Integer has a date of 19.03, which is earlier than yours. Or don't you already believe Rashid's screenshots?
Debatable -- example -- the SIFT algorithm for piecing together pictures. It's patented.
.... What's the point of this screenshot exhibitionism?
>> went out.
>> option 4.
Controversial -- an example -- the SIFT algorithm for piecing together pictures. It's patented.
I think it's the method that's patented, not the algorithm. The point is, it's a legal thing. An algorithm is an implementation of a method. There are a lot of programming languages. So it turns out that if I implemented a method (even if I paste pictures together). This is 1 algorithm in C, another one in C++, the 3rd one in BASIC, etc.
And if the algorithm differs a bit, there is a minus instead of + in one place. Sometimes it may drastically change the working logic. That's why there is only one way out of this deadlock - to patent the method. And the algorithm patent should be refused. In Russia, the algorithms are only registered, that's all. If you need, I can lay out a certificate of registration of the programs, I have a few of them somewhere, but even these certificates do not give protection, just a nice piece of paper and that's all.
Suppose you add one line to the algorithm, and it's no longer yours.
Z.I. And there are screenshots )))) amaze me. Safin sometimes need a rest. You should get off the computer, get some air, or you will get to the point when you need rescuing. not every shrink will be able to do it.