Looking for an MTS. giving a steady 20% or more per month - page 9

 
DFX >> :

Since 1 October 2007 ...... 424 transactions, PF ...... 1,68.


it's a tester it's not interesting...


here from the market, although only two months trading on a breakdown signal

in trade 6 pairs - semi-automatic



Gross Profit: 20 053.26 Gross Loss: 12 835.17 Total Net Profit: 7 218.09
Profit Factor: 1.56 Expected Payoff: 17.48
Absolute Drawdown: 0.00 Maximal Drawdown: 2 660.95 (17.85%) Relative Drawdown: 17.85% (2 660.95)

Total Trades: 413 Short Positions (won %): 178 (70.22%) Long Positions (won %): 235 (80.00%)
Profit Trades (% of total): 313 (75.79%) Loss trades (% of total): 100 (24.21%)
Largest profit trade: 1 050.71 loss trade: -339.03
Average profit trade: 64.07 loss trade: -128.35
Maximum ($): 62 (4 916.33) consecutive losses ($): 8 (-1 501.99)
Maximal consecutive profit (count): 4 916.33 (62) consecutive loss (count): -1 501.99 (8)
Average consecutive wins: 8 consecutive losses: 3
 

DFX, the chart looks quite decent, but not much for guarantees (not very high PF, few trades for statistics).

If you only trade on completed bars, then such testing is adequate. Still - if you can, show the curve on the maximum stretch of history, say from 1999, along with the PF figure. And preferably on a constant lot of 0.1 with a starting deposit of 1000 (if that doesn't break the system).

 
YuraZ >> :

it's a tester it's not interesting...


Here's from the market, but only two months of trading on a breakdown signal

in trading 6 pairs is semi-automatic.


So this time you are sure that your strategy is correct? After all your past projects have all failed, including Wackena, Pipsator and other EAs that you sold...

If sure, why is there no such profitability over a long period, at least in the tester? Semi-automatic is very subjective.

 
YuraZ >> :

it's a tester it's not interesting...


here's from the market, although only two months trading on a breakdown signal

trading 6 pairs - semi-automatic

I was wondering, at the beginning of February this year, did you have a drawdown on this strategy?

 

Anyone who knows the maths, who knows how to value systems equivalent to money, announce the value, I am interested in purely your opinion.

The system has been running for 2 weeks, 22 currency pairs.


 
HIDDEN >> :

Anyone who knows the maths, who knows how to value systems equivalent to money, announce the value, I am interested in purely your opinion.

The system has been running for 2 weeks, 22 currency pairs.


Martins again?

 
gip >> :

Martins again?

It doesn't really matter what strategy, here are the numbers, chart, put your estimate in $.

Martins, non-martins, gannets or whatever....

Here's how I'll answer that, the first data from the Andron Collider test run was taken and applied to each currency pair.

What is the probability of a forex black hole forming and its cost?

 
HIDDEN >> :

It doesn't really matter what strategy, here are the numbers, chart, put your estimate in $.

Martins, non-martins, gannets or whatever....

Here's how I'll answer that, the first data from the Andron Collider test run was taken, and applied to each currency pair.

What is the probability of a forex black hole forming and its cost?

If there are no normal entry points, if the outputs are based on the general growth as you described in another thread, then it is a common scam, of which there are many. You can sell at $100.

 
DFX >> :

So this time you are sure you have the right strategy? After all, all your past projects have failed, including Wackena, Pipsator and other EAs that you sold...

If sure, why is there no such profitability over the long term, at least in the tester? A semi-automatic is very subjective.

The tester is... that's nothing... Did you see before the championship how most participants' equity was dying out?

>> the tester helps to debug and find bugs

--

nothing seems to be failing.

there are clients on the pipsatore even now ...

there are clients just ordering EAs ... and everyone seems to be happy ...

---

You're looking at the result - in real time - not rocket equity testers!

--

The semi-automatic is just the result, in my opinion.

---

but a full automaton - autonomous, with a 10 year water supply and sustenance - is a myth.

 
gip >> :

If there are no normal entry points, if the output is based on the total growth of the deposit, as you described in another thread, then it is a common scam, of which there are many. You may sell at $100.

And if not a martin, but if the entry and exit are tied to a clear logic and if the output is not the total balance of the deposit, and each pair exits at a given takeaway .....