YZ_PIPSATOR_EURGPB - inspiration from championship results - page 17
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Pluralism of opinion above all!
Freedom to Yuri Detochkin! (с) )))
It's funny, but even here the traditional opposition between patriots and liberals is modelled:
Patriots: "They're all greedy, stupid, fake bastards, and they'll eat us up at the first opportunity!"
Liberals: "You're just stupid sovoks and don't know anything, in fact they're dushkas and you're all cunts and we're all cunts!"
So you're gonna have to make a judgement...
the most reliable paper is the one you use to go to the toilet with. It's the reliable, squishy one.
Well, these bonds don't come close to being the most reliable.
Timbo, don't be fooled, you're not a bad analyst. It's not the people buying bonds...
The question is what counts as the people. Of course, bonds are not bought by metatrader users, they do not have the guts to do it. However, if large investment institutions-insurance companies, investment funds, pension funds-are considered representatives of the people, because they invest the people's money, then we can say that the people are the ones buying U.S. bonds. Russians bought a lot of those things, too. Indirectly, of course.
The question is what counts as the people. Naturally, bonds are not bought up by metatrader users, they do not have the stomach for it. However, if large investment institutions - insurance companies, investment funds, pension funds - are considered representatives of the people, because they invest the people's money, then we can say that it is the people who are buying American bonds. Russians bought a lot of those things, too. Indirectly, of course.
))) We must remember what their rules say. The funds have the right to work only with allegedly "highly reliable securities. Let them just try to buy papers a la Prival && C.
Paper is paper and paper is still paper, it can be hard or soft.)
The simple truth is to buy assets (that bring income), but to buy the debt of a bubble is nonsense (although it is understandable, why try to keep it afloat, if it sinks it will be too bad for anyone). America already owes so much that it will never pay it back. It is a bubble and it will burst at some point, it is just a matter of time...
))) After all, America already owes so much that it will never pay it back. It's a bubble and it will burst at some point, it's only a matter of time...
Debtors don't get killed... They will be resuscitated until their last breath...
Paper by paper, but it would be better to return to the topic: how are things going with the pipsator?
For me, there is no such thing. It is better to use the word good TS. It's just that the 4-point criterion isn't it. Open gold and you will understand. You need 200 pips there as the spread is 100. Let's go back to the euro pound with these 200 pips and what is a good strategy. 200 pips per trade. 500 trades overnight...wake up in the morning and Bill Gates is a pauper compared to you )
There are peculiar properties to the movement of currency pairs. depending on the time of day. This may and should be used. And testing is not driven by the king of peas, until today. We should consider the time of day. One algorithm at night, another one in the daytime etc.
There are pairs with a spread of 250 pips. But as I found out there is almost no profit to be made.
Zotolo is a metal...
There are many good trades. This pipsun that's in second place now can be described as satisfying MTS.
For me 30 poses in a row of 100 pips would be enough for a start deposit of 50$ and a leverage of 1:100, if we do not take into account the spread => profit = 26.843.545.600$.
There are pairs with a spread of 250 pips. But as I found out there is almost no profit to be made.
Zotolo is a metal...
There are many good trades. This pipsun that's in second place now can be described as satisfying MTS.
For me 30 positions in a row of 100 pips would be enough for me with 50$ starting deposit and 1:100 leverage, if spread is not taken into account => profit = 26.843.545.600$.
Gold is a very specific thing
10 figures is ok there ...
---
Pipsetters have taken a firm place in TOP-10 and will hardly leave it
written perfectly - quality, but specifically for the server METAQUOTES - and unfortunately on this server can not shoot profits ( except possibly winning the championship)
--
If you put it on the real world, it's a completely different story,
as an example you can see the struggles on the real world described here
https://www.mql5.com/ru/users/LeoV
so its use in the real world is highly questionable
---
I think if we are talking about real trading and not demo!
I think if we're talking about real trading instead of demo trading, it's probably not as bright!
like in the championship.
---
On the real it looks something like this:
18:29:52 'xxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 129.68
18:29:57 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:30:00 'xxxxxxxx': requote 129.67 / 129.71 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 129.68
18:30:09 'xxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 129.83
18:30:13 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:30:15 'xxxxxxxx': requote 129.82 / 129.86 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 129.83
18:30:27 'xxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 130.00
18:30:39 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:30:39 'xxxxxxxx': requote 129.93 / 129.97 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 130.00
18:30:52 'xxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 130.07
18:31:12 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:31:15 'xxxxxxxx': requote 130.01 / 130.05 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 130.07
18:31:33 'xxxxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 130.04
18:31:47 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:31:50 'xxxxxxxx': requote 130.01 / 130.05 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 130.04
18:32:07 'xxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 130.09
18:32:12 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:32:14 'xxxxxxxx': requote 130.04 / 130.08 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 130.09
18:32:35 'xxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 130.00
18:32:37 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:32:38 'xxxxxxxx': requote 130.01 / 130.05 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 130.00
18:33:01 'xxxxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 129.98
18:33:02 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:33:03 'xxxxxxxx': requote 129.97 / 130.01 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 129.98
18:33:41 'xxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 129.93
18:33:46 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:33:49 'xxxxxxxx': requote 129.86 / 129.90 for order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY closing at 129.93
18:33:59 'xxxxxx': close order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 at price 129.86
18:34:04 'xxxxxxxx': request was accepted by server
18:34:07 'xxxxxxxx': order #26204407 sell 0.40 EURJPY at 127.11 sl: 130.19 tp: 120.11 closed at price 129.89
Slippage is 3 points, i.e. it looks like it should have closed on the first request. And this is a cent account (at an investor brokerage company). My Expert Advisor is not a pips one, I have just decided to trade on minutes, in the noise so to speak :) I managed to make more than 20 trades in the evening and started this mess. I don't know why I'm trading with pips in the morning.
such requotes with overrequests have occurred more than once and not only in MTS,
and it has nothing to do with any unfriendly monitoring
the reason is the technical ability to overlap the orders from its flow.
- end of the week;
- all together stand in one direction and wait;
- fast movement;
- market crowd is resting after a good trend;
i.e.
=a)there is simply no other counter-order in the DC flow, b)to buy back your position from your funds is not profitable, c) "interbank" has gone....
If you put it on the real world, the picture is very different,
for example, the real life ordeal described here
https://www.mql5.com/ru/users/LeoV
That is why its application in real trading is very questionable.
It seems to me that in addition to all the risks of traditional (non-pips) EAs, there are two more risks when trading with scalping EAs
1. The risk associated with increased problems in opening deals - requotes, slippage, etc.
2. Risk associated with profit payout.