Another latest EA, unbeatable results ( awaiting criticism) - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yes, I agree with you brother, we all get the full heat.
I am a newbie on this forum and I get it right away that someone is looking for a gimmick that can help him to increase profits but it does not help everyone.
for someone who tried to install different terminals simultaneously mql4 1-2 or 3 on his computer in different folders in Program files try
i can give you the address of my terminal http://www.itdc.ru/ you can download it but my point is each terminal shows different i.e.
for example: Fractal, Aligator, AO, AC which I mostly work with for example even set one
i.e. set one and the same EA on different terminals with the same and the same tested characteristics, the result is as you can see. I already downloaded
i have downloaded about 25 EAs and been tested on different terminals and i've selected 2 out of them.
I concluded that the EA should be based on Bill Williams, i.e. on Fractal, Alegatore, AC.
And as for Elliott Waves, it's full of crap.
As for Bill Williams, I can provide you with literature, you may send your request to ratios@mail.ru or download it from the forum.
It's just that the idea is the man himself. God whispers by intuition when to open and when to close.
It is clear,
Another thing is that you want to mechanise all this, and let the machine think where to open and where to close
As practice shows, they will hire a bunch of hackers and break the computer. This is where you either keep quiet or speak up when you have already made a lot of money.
And the code of the Expert Advisor is a hoax - it's like pollyutia, probably from a degree, but not from the money.
Simply, the idea is the man himself. God whispers by intuition when to open and when to close.
It is clear,
Another thing is that you want to mechanise all this, and let the machine think where to open and where to close.
As practice shows - they will hire a bunch of hackers and break the computer. This is where you either keep quiet or speak up when you have already made a lot of money.
And the code of the Expert Advisor is a hoax - it's like a sex drive, not a science degree, but money.
What practice shows that there have been instances of a com break?
You're telling the truth!
Goldtrader// Why are you torturing everyone, we will soon be hiring hackers to attack your computer and get hold of your priceless idea.
//You're talking about some scary stuff!
So there are no ideas, or are they just not given out?
Who, even as an example, can give at least one idea!
Sorry looked at the thread one nonsense, maybe I wasn't paying attention.
to fit it to the data on a certain interval of several years is not very difficult - a genetic
And afterwards I added all implements and mindless code in about two or three lines for solidity and appearance.
and go ahead, look for the right kind of contingent. Even an experienced person would not immediately understand such nonsense, let alone a novice. The more that he will be told in a conspiratorial voice, "Come on, I'll give you a brilliant idea with the sources for free, you look, no one, no one...".
And then this masterpiece for a week will probably still be giving some results, and then, at best, it will not very quickly drain the entire depot.
I cannot honestly understand those who want to buy an EA. I cannot understand fraudsters, at least I understand them - they just want to make a quick buck without thinking too much about morals. But those who are trying to buy a box of money, the truth I do not understand. I mean, what kind of brains...
to think that someone would sell a printing press instead of printing their own money.
In fact, even if an EA is sold with the source code, it does not guarantee that it is not a scam. If the Expert Advisor has a lot of
to fit it to the data on a certain interval of several years is not very difficult - a genetic
The genetic optimizer will tweak and re-optimize anything you want.
This, too, is clear to everyone who is more or less versed in MT4. But the rest of the majority of users do not understand this, right? That is, we can call it the second type of scam - "History Matching". In principle, this has already been discussed quite a lot on forums, but there is an overwhelming majority of users who still believe that the genetic algorithm can give birth to a miracle without the idea itself!
If an expert is overoptimized, even an experienced EA writer, even if he has
Even an experienced EA writer may not immediately realize that his or her code is overoptimized, especially
Even more so if he has a few thousand lines of code stuffed into it (I once saw an ad, there was a team of guys
tried to sell source code of "genius creation" for several million quid).
And what to say about beginners, who usually try to get everything at once and inexpensively.
True it is impossible to show this fact by means of a code, because the proof of impossibility to give birth to a printing press by means of mass selection of parameters lies in deep mathematical wilds, which few specialists reach, and simple users simply do not need it, because it is not clear from the very beginning (see for example my previous post solandr 27.06.2007:28, or rather the response of one of mainstream users to offer to look at Forex from mathematical point of view, which was born much earlier than Forex, and thank
There are a lot of different kinds of people on the forex market, and, accordingly, mentality breeds
methods of reaching one's goals. Those who know mathematics try to use it somehow.
Those who are unfamiliar with it are looking for something else.
Long ago I had an idea to write an expert imitating Fourier decomposition
of a given test interval by means of a genetic optimizer. That is, in the Expert Advisor
parameters of five to ten harmonics are set in a template while the amplitudes and frequencies are selected by the optimizer based on maximum profitability of opening deals. This would actually be a simple and obvious proof of the pointlessness of overoptimization but I have never got round to
But I have never got to this expert.
Once upon a time I had an idea to write an Expert Advisor imitating Fourier decomposition of
of a given tested interval using a genetic optimizer. In other words, parameters of five to ten harmonics are set in the
Expert Advisor in a template, while the amplitudes and frequencies are selected by the optimizer based on the maximum profitability of opening trades.
Actually, this would be a simple and clear proof of the pointlessness of overoptimization but somehow I cannot get my hands on this Expert Advisor.
Indeed we would end up with a smeared out harmonic spectrum both in frequency and amplitude (within limits). Although it is possible that some harmonics (frequency closer to 0) are slightly highlighted due to the limited available history. That is, something may skew a little, thus giving believers an opportunity to point their fingers on a spectrum and say, for example, that harmonic with frequency of 1/(a couple of months) is noticeably greater than harmonic with frequency of 1/(1 day) ;o). Yes, although believers in optimization this method of proof is unlikely to convince, because for this you need at least a little understanding of mathematics.
//To look at Forex in terms of mathematics, which was born much earlier than Forex, and thanks to which our life is exactly as it is now - for example, we drive cars, not horse-drawn carts like in the century before last).
A very logical and literate form of thought. Covers a wide range of examples and is understandable and provable to most. 95% lose in forex. What to do?