![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I didn't expect you to support my ideas. )) But of course it's not only my ideas. Very well then).
You're welcome. The GOP is a closed-minded people. They only see their own sandbox. I am like that myself. That is why it is very useful to adopt a different approach. This is the proverbial sharing of experiences.
s.e. Maybe you should also learn about OOP from the perspective of your approach. I.e. to understand the zen (or squalor) of OOP, you need to express your architecture using classes. Moreover, I emphasize the word "express with OOP", not to replace your vision with the OOP view.
s.e. Maybe you should learn about OOP from your approach. I.e. to understand the zen (or squalor) of OOP, you need to express your architecture using classes. Moreover, I emphasize the word "express with OOP", not to replace your vision with the OOP-view.
Реter Konow:
...
To design and implement my tasks using OOP alone is impossible.
If I used OOP, I wouldn't have anywhere near what I have now.
With OOP I'd need a large team.
...
This is where you are wrong. OOP codes do grow much faster than procedural codes. But, this growth continues only in the beginning of the project, then it starts to slow down, and eventually the code base starts to grow even slower than procedural codes.
All statements are far-fetched. You don't know what would happen if you used OOP, because you simply don't know it. It is strange that you draw any conclusions at all. Conclusions without reason (from nothing) are fictions. :)
Perhaps. I have drawn my own conclusions, which are an opinion. Naturally, I will not be able to verify it.
Conclusions from an opinion. From an opinion can only be questions, the answers to which will allow you to understand, feel, get to know and implement, and then draw conclusions.
And the conclusions from an opinion are... Um... Earth is an infinite plane. These are the conclusions I've come to - I haven't seen it from space and I'm not rolling off the surface anywhere...
I'm guessing. Not without reason. Believe me.
Making assumptions and offering to take your word for it in a technical forum is silly, to say the least. Evidence must be given by real tests and results if you want to be taken seriously.
And it's not the first time you've said that. Maybe you have a short memory. That would explain a lot then. )
Conclusions from an opinion. Out of an opinion can only be questions, the answers to which will allow you to understand, feel, get to know and implement, and then draw conclusions.
And inferences from an opinion are... um... The Earth is an infinite plane. These are the conclusions I have come to - I have not seen from space and I have not rolled from the surface...
Artem, it turns out the Earth is really flat!Scientifically proven even.
:)