Algorithm Optimisation Championship. - page 38

New comment
 
Реter Konow:

Suppose you know the optimum values of the factors influencing the object temperature:

q1 = 1,

q2 = 2,

q3 = 3,

q4 = 10;

At these values of these factors, the temperature of the object during the day remains in the optimal range, within which the object does not overheat or overcool.

You know these optimum values.

Others do not know these optimum values, but they have the option of going to a function and passing their values of these factors there to see if they will be acceptable to the object. It will not melt down.

In exchange for passing values, the function will return the answer - the temperature of the object. Based on the logic of the responses you can understand the pattern of influence of different values of various factors on the object temperature and calculate the optimal range of values for each factor, in which the object will be fine.

So...

What do temperature, mass, colour, etc. have to do with it? It has nothing to do with the goal of finding the optimum parameters. I, like you, will know nothing about what is in the FF. And neither will anyone else.
 

About the visualisation of multidimensional spaces:

 
Andrey Dik:
What do temperature, mass, colour, etc. have to do with it? It has nothing to do with the goal of finding optimal parameters. I, like you, will know nothing about what is in the FF. And neither will anyone else.

Temperature is an example.

I know you are a member and will know nothing about FF. But there are other people...

Optimal parameters of what? Always add what. Otherwise there's a lot of confusion - Optimization of what, parameters of what, search of what...

You're either optimising the search or optimising the parameters...

 
Andrey Dik:
What does temperature, mass, colour, etc. have to do with it? It is irrelevant for the purpose of finding the optimum parameters. I, like you, will know nothing about what is in the FF. And neither will anyone else.
Don't rack your brains. I have the feeling that you are answering your questions just to give some kind of answer. You have no answers to my questions.
The correct answer to the question "How do you graph a function with more than 3 parameters? - "None."
The correct answer to the question "What strategy can be applied to a FF whose formula is unknown?" - "Only strategies that take into account probabilities can give a win among other strategies."
It is possible that quantum principles of information transfer can give a gain over probabilistic estimates, but until I have personally tried it, I cannot say for sure.
There is no way to graph the values of an unknown function other than direct brute force, and don't beat yourselves up.
 
Andrey Dik:
Do not rack your brains. I get the feeling you're answering questions just to give some kind of answer. You have no answers to my questions.
The correct answer to the question "How do you graph a function with more than 3 parameters? - "None."
The correct answer to the question "What strategy can be applied to a FF whose formula is unknown?" - "Only strategies that take into account probabilities can give a win among other strategies."
It is possible that quantum principles of information transfer can give a gain over probabilistic estimates, but until I have personally tried it, I cannot say for sure.
There is no way to graph the values of an unknown function other than direct brute force.
Well, I won't rack my brains anymore. Your championship, you break it.
 
Vasiliy Sokolov:

About the visualisation of multidimensional spaces:

I showed this video a few pages ago. :)
 
Реter Konow:

Temperature is an example.

I know you are a member and will know nothing about FF. But there are other people...

Optimal parameters of what? Always add what. Otherwise there's a lot of confusion - Optimization of what, parameters of what, search of what...

You're either optimizing search or optimizing parameters...

I suffer from sclerosis too, but your sclerosis seems to be better than mine.

double FF (double &array[]);

Remember those letters?

This is FF and there is nothing but calling this function from the *.ex5 library. You have to find such parameters array[], at which FF will return maximal value. This is maximal FF.

And what other people are there? I admit, of course, possibility of existence of God, besides him no one will know what is inside FF.

 
 
Anatoli Kazharski:

Funny video. It's a pity they didn't show what the algorithm would do if they started the evolution from a flat spot on the surface - always give the algorithm a chance to catch a lift. And there are only two parameters.

Maybe the author of the video is among us, speak back.

 
Andrey Dik:

I suffer from sclerosis too, but your sclerosis seems cooler than mine.

Remember those letters?

This is FF, and there is nothing but calling this function from *.ex5 library. You have to find such parameters array[], at which FF will return maximal value. This is maximal FF.

And what other people are there? I admit, of course, possibility of existence of God, besides him no one will know what is inside FF.

If you say so.)))

Okay.

I accept multi-dimensional space. (Why struggle with this "idea"?)

1...313233343536373839404142434445...133
New comment