Is it possible to do the impossible?
the topic of paradoxes in general is extremely interesting and gradually leads to zen, and teaches you to think open-mindedly
I've been brainwashed by the 1-2+3-4+5 series...=> 1/4
in the unloved terwer and matstat, there are a mountain of paradoxes :-)
...
There's a mountain of paradoxes in the unloved tervers and matstata :-)
Why have probability theory and matstatistics suddenly become unloved here? Seems to be fine with them here. But with nonsense based on probability theory and matstatistics problems.
What are the paradoxes?
Einstein and the GTR/STO, that's generally cool.
"there's a huge toad flying towards you at 0.97C; can you figure out it's a toad?"
Why are probability theory and matstatistics suddenly unloved here? They seem to be fine here. But there are problems with nonsense based on probability theory and matstatistics.
What are the paradoxes?
Is it possible in MT4 to automatically test an EA in descending order of time being tested? For example from 2015.01.01 to 2015.12.31, next step from 2015.01.02 to 2015.12.31 and so on.
I solve this problem by using the optimizer:
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+ // Внешние переменные input bool CheckEvery_Day=false; input bool TestEachYearSeparately=false; input int DayOfYear_=1; input int Year_=2009; // Эксперт функция тик void OnTick(void) { if(CheckEvery_Day) { if(TestEachYearSeparately) if(Year()<Year_ || (Year()<=Year_ && DayOfYear()<DayOfYear_) || Year()>Year_) return; //тестировать каждый год отдельно else if(Year()<Year_ || (Year()<=Year_ && DayOfYear()<DayOfYear_)) return; //тестировать весь период } // Ваш код } //+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Choose a time period:
Turn on Optimizer:
We get the result, where you can see how the Expert Advisor passes the test each time starting from a new day:
Why are probability theory and matstatistics suddenly unloved here? They seem to be fine here. But there's a problem with nonsense based on probability theory and matstatistics.
And what paradoxes?
Is this the first time you've heard of TV and MC paradoxes?
Here, have a look. There are many good examples:
SEKAI G / PARADOXES IN PROBABILITY THEORY AND MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
Category:Mathematics 11 March 2010Title: Paradoxes in Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics
Author: Sekei G.
Abstract: A book by a Hungarian mathematician containing a collection of unexpected conclusions and statements from probability theory, mathematical statistics and the theory of random processes It is written vividly and fascinatingly, the material presented in it can be used to illustrate in university lectures on probability theory, and some sections can be used in the work of school mathematics circles
For mathematicians of various qualifications, for all students of probability theory and mathematical statistics
Download in pdf (11,4 MB ):Sekey G. / Paradoxes in probability theory and mathematical statistics
vixri.com.
Is this the first time you've heard of TV and MS paradoxes?
Check it out. There are many good examples:
SECEI G / PARADOXES IN PROBABILITY THEORY AND MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
Category:Mathematics 11 March 2010Title: Paradoxes in Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics.
Author: Seksey G.
Abstract: The book by the Hungarian mathematician containing a collection of unexpected findings and statements from probability theory, mathematical statistics and random processes theory. It is written in a lively and fascinating manner, and the material presented therein can be used for illustration in university lectures on probability theory, while some sections can be used in the work of school mathematical circles.
For mathematicians of various qualifications, for all students of probability theory and mathematical statistics
Download in pdf (11,4 MB ):Sekey G. / Paradoxes in probability theory and mathematical statistics
vixri.com.
And then something himself is able to write in his own words, or only on the links, and on screenshots?
I'm off to read a book now. Most of these paradoxes arise from the author's ignorance, from the incorrect formulation of the problem. You have to open your eyes and mind and there are no paradoxes.
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
The paradox of omnipotence:
The paradox is usually formulated as a question: "Can a god create a stone that he himself cannot lift?" (I think yes, an infinite cycle of creating and lifting)or
"Could God create a triangle with internal angles that were not 180 degrees in total?"(I think Yes, Riemann geometry).
If Columbus had been asked, "Is it possible to get from Europe to America within 24 hours?", I think with the possibilities of the time he would have said no, but these days any child will say it is possible. The question that follows is, "Did this possibility already exist in Columbus' time or has it only appeared in our days?"Theoretically the possibility has existed all the time but in practice it has only become available today. Is it possible to conclude from this that: Anything that does not contradict mathematics is possible, whether we can physically implement it or not?The possibilities exist whether we are aware of them or not.