FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2016 - page 949
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I wish I knew how to test it =) I'm not a programmer, I'm a trader =)
Are you a speculator? Terrible...
That's how it is =) You have to measure up =)
I wish I knew how to test it =) I'm not a programmer, I'm a salesman =)
I'm not giving up the system.)
you already did, or do you think i can't figure it out?
i just don't have the time yet
The test will be like I showed you and nothing else.
There all the parameters you take off - unprofitable hours, days and so on.
You use the test to remove calculation errors.
Well, in general - a complete mess.
Let's test the system inside out.
Then why is it that in the stats I was showing I have a maximum drawdown of less than 1%)?
I think you're not really doing what you're showing... I mean you're using something else as a filter... or it's more trivial... the usual human factor... based on your experience...
I think you're not really doing what you're showing... I mean you're using something else as a filter. Or it's more commonplace... the human factor... based on your experience...
Options are only used as a filter.
And if you look at the stack and the tape, you can see a good amount of share.
The main factor is the futures, or rather the pose mm on it, which way to look, and usually they show the direction for months, sometimes weeks.
Then why do I have a maximal drawdown of less than 1% in the statement I showed you?)
I already did, or do you think I can't figure it out?
I just don't have the time yet.
and the test will be like I showed you and nothing else.
You take down all the parameters there - losing hours, days and so on.
I gave away the system? =) don't be ridiculous =)