FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2016 - page 1157
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Pharaoh, Georgians are usually sincere people, why are you so vile?
And what is myscruffiness about?
Your duplicity.
I'm sorry, tavaristch, but you don't have to tell us what the spread is, we've had it all, excuse me for a word, and almost anyone can tell you more about the same spread, if he wants to, of course, and in general, I personally do not care about it, the spread as much as you mentioned it %).
I agree that it's all water, actually what the spread is.
But my post was about something else. The point is that all position traders can be divided into two categories:
- those who trade in the right direction;
- those who trade in neither direction (neither right nor wrong), if considered in the aggregate.
The first category is steadily earning. And these are very few.
The second category is losing (by Spread, if considered as an average).
Conclusion:
There is no need to try to earn on those who trade in the wrong direction. Because there is no such category. The only way to earn (steadily) - is to learn to trade correctly, so that the big and (or) small "uncles" share (forced) part of their earnings (Spread).
PS. And for you personally I am sincerely glad that you are already doing well;).
I agree that it's all water, actually, on what the spread is.
But my post was about something else. It was about the fact that all position traders can be divided into two categories:
- those who trade in the right direction;
- those who trade in neither direction (neither right nor wrong), if considered in the aggregate.
The first category consistently earns.
The second category is losing (by Spread, if considered as an average).
Conclusion:
There is no need to try to earn on those who trade in the wrong direction. Because there is no such category. The only way to earn (steadily) - is to learn to trade correctly, so that the big and (or) small "uncles" share (forced) part of their earnings (Spread).
PS. And for you personally I am sincerely glad that you are already doing well;)
Clearly, you're looking!
... all position traders can be divided into two categories:
- those who trade in the right direction;
- Those who trade in no direction (neither right nor wrong) when viewed in the general mass.
... The only way to earn (steadily) is to learn how to trade correctly...
On MT4 you don't need to look at M1. Brokers make so many mistakes in that history (skipping bars, deleting candlesticks, drawing patterns) that the analysis of history and testing of Expert Advisors is useless. As a last resort, you can use programs like Tickstory to insert the downloaded bars from Dukascopy broker into the M1 terminal, it will be more reliable. There will be the history since 2005 or so.
Or go straight to Dukascopy and download the history for analysis without mt4: https://www.dukascopy.com/swiss/english/marketwatch/historical/
It's easier and more convenient to use MT5, connect to MetaQuotes-Demo server, create a demo account and use a good quality tick history. But the real tick history starts only from 2012, and it's better to check, go to the folder file->open data folder from the terminal, and further \bases\MetaQuotes-Demo\\<symbol name> to see which months the tick files have been downloaded. If the tick history is not enough - then you can run some EA in the tester for the previous years in the mode of real ticks, the tick history will be downloaded.
Thanks, I will have a look.
MT on the M1 has a 3-month history
On Dukas the M1 story used to be downloadable
Dukas
Holy moly, Eidler, you're back) Hi.