FOREX - Trends, Forecasts and Implications 2015(continued) - page 1358

 
stranger:
Go to North. And run it on one pair.
I'll try, but North, as I recall, is a zone specialist.
 
stranger:

Because we don't have yards, we focus on a shorter time frame, which is why we need to monitor their actions to know when they have gained and when they have lost, so that it is not like your example with stocks and crowds.

How? By having and funding a network of informants in the books of the Morgans, Dupons and Rothschilds?

Or to gobble up what lies in the public domain? And where's the guarantee that it's not a lie?

If it were that simple, the Rothschilds would be making money in the subways... or do you think there aren't enough smart people dreaming of milking them?

 
Nestradamus:
It is not always the poor competitors who spy on those who spend yards in the market, and they are not always successful. And we are dust in the wind... And no one would even think of sharing information (or even misinformation) with us.
Yes it does. No one wants to share the dough, not from the sky, not from the sub-plintus...... for this is widely used communication, from which the Crowd draws information...... so I am only on the chart. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's my decision.
 
Vadens:
It comes. No one wants to share the dough, not from the sky, not from the sub-plintus...... for this is widely used and communication, from which the Crowd and draws information...... so I am only on the chart. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's my decision.

To begin with, we are not a crowd. I mean those who are trying to nibble away at the financial market, investing 500 times less with awesome leverage.

Our money is interesting only to the dealing centres, which flourish at our expense. How many of them are there in the world? I am not sure, but I think there are no more than a hundred and fifty. Each of them has a thousand and a half clients. That's 225,000 traders for the whole planet, tops.

And you're right about the chart, the price, or rather its fluctuations are paramount. Everything else is just bogus...

 
Nestradamus:

How? By getting and funding a network of informants in the books of the Morgans, the Dupons and the Rothschilds?

Or eat what's in the public domain? And where's the guarantee that it's not a lie?

If it were that simple, the Rothschilds would be making money in the subways... or do you think there aren't enough smart people dreaming of milking them?

Once again, there is no way that what is sold or bought, the traded volume, can be a désa.

There are few smart people, and even fewer smart and hardworking ones.

 
Folks, what do you think of the euras in relation to the terrorist attacks?
 
ValeraY:
Folks, what do you think of the euras in relation to the terrorist attacks?
Nothing. It's still the same.
1.0768 as of this minute.
 
stranger:

Once again, there is no way that what has been sold or bought, the volume traded, can be a disgrace.

There are few smart people, and even fewer smart and hard-working ones.

What has been traded has already had its effect on currency fluctuations, and how can you use it without a time machine?
 
Nestradamus:
What has been traded has already had its impact on currency fluctuations, and how to use it without a time machine?

Nestradamus, you're not an adolescent.)

Is it hard to see from the traded volumes where there is a build up and where there is an unloading?

Even intraday positions do not get filled in one second, maybe when making a hustle).

 
Nestradamus:
What is traded has already had its effect on currency fluctuations, and how can this be used without a time machine?
not "has" but "has". until the level disappears.
Reason: