Market theory - page 40
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
people in black....... can't we just give up on them then?
This Youseed is still in contact with them, but Yusuf has been drinking with them all for about 40 pages)))
Go on, Yusuf, extract it! And give it to us! In the form of interest from PAMMs and Signals...
And Koshi had no idea that his inequality would kill the WORLD FINANCIAL SYSTEM!!! :)
We need to find a way out of this stalemate. Here are the options:
1. As each strategy holder becomes a monopolist, anti-monopoly techniques must be applied in the form of limiting profits to reasonable limits, e.g. no profits over 5 times the refinancing rate in each country;
2. Selling TCs through the Marketplace of Metacvots for a very high fee, in order to extract funds from potential holders of TCs;
3. To run PAMMs and signals under the rules of compulsory compliance with point 1 by a limited set of traders;
4. Reducing the threshold for maximum loot;
5. Members are asked to continue to look for compromise options.
And Cauchi had no idea that his inequality would kill the WORLD FINANCIAL SYSTEM!!! :)
If the results of market theory are used to describe the real market for goods and services, from the shop, shopping malls, markets in the usual sense of the word, the producers of goods and services, then it has the potential to make the world economy in general and market players in particular flourish. It becomes dangerous for macro markets with unlimited liquidity, stock markets, equity markets and the like. Surely, just for fear of destroying some market, humanity cannot give up understanding the objective laws of the market. So, if the equitable laws of the market are able to destroy such markets, then we conclude that these markets are not created correctly, without taking into account the true laws of supply and demand, and they need to adjust the principles of their existence, for example, by limiting the volatility of instruments within reasonable limits, up to a straight line, limited only by ensuring the return of transactions' value. In short, this is a warning to the "wrong" markets, either to rebuild them or society will destroy them and create a new financial market according to the laws of the functioning of the real markets for goods and services.
You are overcomplicating things here (here, in this sentence), mixing things up and then simplifying the way the problem is solved. It's simpler: there is capitalism - enriching whoever is closest to the bank, as the banks (all of them) create financial bubbles. There's socialism - it's "one central opinion", without permission to have another. And there is the principle of "love, friendship and sympathy" which has existed since the creation of the world, which can be called CONTRACTIVISM - that is contract law. And there are absolutely brilliant quotes from Ronald Reagan about how contractivism is regularly destroyed by the state, replacing it with administration:
= Government always finds a need for whatever money is spent. (Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.)
= Government does not solve problems; it subsidises them. (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.)
=Thegovernment's economic policy can essentially be reduced to a few short phrases: If something moves, tax it; if it still moves, regulate it; and if it doesn't move, subsidize it. (The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.)
=Who are the communists? They are those who have read Marx and Lenin. Who are the anti-communists? They are those who have understood what they've read. (How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.)
=I'm not worried about the (budget) deficit. It's already big enough to take care of itself. (I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself.)
=The most terrifying words in English are: "I'm from government and I'm here to help you". (The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)