You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
here , Otkritie Broker
The state of the RTS Index is apparently about to be hit by the Price of the Market and the market is about to go upwards:
The market is competitive with two breakeven levels: Price1 = 91870 and Price2 = 107361.07:
So you are saying that you were able to identify a strong pattern leading to profitable trading? Generally speaking, if you do a frequency analysis of the direction of movement a day ahead, it turns out that, at least, this parameter is independent of the nearest past prices, there will always be about 50% of guesses. What percentage of profitable trades were you making in 2010-2011?
An analogue EQ is a good example. But a live person generally won't hear a difference if the bass is 10 milliseconds behind.
Analogue EQ is a good example. ... Note that here the filter core is 'one-way'.
Why? What do you mean one-way? What's stopping you from taking a filter with a buffer and running it through?
you can put an SMA(20) on any chart with a shift of -10, there's your "unstretched" filter.
406 profitable out of 501 trades = 81.03%.
Cool. Such a percentage on a sample size of 501 trade opportunities is quite difficult to match.
Nobel to Yusuf, definitely.
Daniil Stolnikov:
...Take the same picture, let Vin be the raw data, Vout - after filtering. For sound, there is no difference. For the price data there is a big difference.
What's the difference? I don't understand - they both oscillate. The only thing is that the sound oscillates around zero, the price is always above zero. But I'm sure it can all be converted to the right kind of sound.
What's the difference? I don't understand - they both oscillate. The only thing is that the sound oscillates around zero, the price is always above zero. But I'm sure it can all be converted to the right form.
although econometricians will say that the increments are stationary ))))
And MA2 (simple MA2) for example is calculated as kloz+lag1cloz/2... ...i.e. the past values are used.
You can try to remove the lag by prediction... with a neural network or the like... but it still won't work properly...
A sound wave is a sine wave. Cotiers are not stationary and subtracting the trend does not really change the picture,
Although econometricians will say that increments are stationary ))))
MA2 (simple MA2) is calculated as kloz+lag1cloz/2... ...i.e. the past values are used.
You can try to remove the lag by prediction... with a neural network or the like... but it still won't work properly...
Yes, it's more complicated than that. But first we need to find out what will bring us a profit)))) We could play around with Fourier or something. We could do a lot of math and build it up without the HF and so on.
I have nothing at hand, well, for example from the player music. You'll get a yellow line, though. If the voice, you can recognize it, if we know it,
that a short after the letter A would bring in a profit...