You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh then I suppose you'll be claiming you have nine fingers?
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, then I suppose you will claim to have nine fingers?
Don't confuse the number of elements with their indexation.
OK, let's say you were asked to name the fingers on your hand
what would you call them?
Zero one two...
or would you call them...
first second third... ?
Isn't it obvious that it's more convenient to have the same number as the index?
OK, let's say you were asked to name the fingers on your hand
what would you call them?
Zero one two...
or would you call them...
first second third... ?
isn't it obvious that it's more convenient when the number is the same as the index
Thumb, index finger, middle finger, ring finger, little finger. Before that, indicate the hand (left/right). ;))
is it not obvious that it is more convenient to have the same number as the index
For some reason, houses on streets are numbered from 1
floors in buildings (usually) from 1
rooms with 1
Why are warrants numbered from 0?
What if someone has six fingers?)
And what if one has six fingers?))
Errrr then I suppose you will claim that you have nine fingers on your hand?
Nah, everyone has eleven fingers:
Counting on the first hand from the end: 10, 9, 8, 7, 6;
Counting on the second hand from the beginning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5;
Add fingers on first and second hand: 6 + 5 = 11.
That was to be proved. A man has eleven fingers on his hand.
This unnecessary technogeneity only creates confusion.
it's like an anecdote
there are 10 categories of people - those who use the binary system and those who don't
why don't they write EAs in assembly language at all?